$1$

Multiple Answer

$5$ points

$\backslash$table$[[$Policy$,$Lena,David,Kathleen$],[$Cancer research,$1$st$,2$nd$,3$rd$],[$Mass transit,$2$nd$,3$rd$,1$st$],[$Border security,$3$rd$,1$st$,2$nd$]]$

The table above represents the preferences, in order from lease $(3)$ to most $(1),$ of three voters in a democratic system. Assuming there is a $$2$ billion dollar allocation that can be made to any one of the three options listed, which of the following must be true? Select all that apply.

If Mass Transit is voted on against Cancer Research, Cancer Research will always win.

Lena will vote for the money to be allocated to Cancer Research rather than Mass Transit.

Border Security will lose no matter what alternative it is competing with.

Kathleen values Mass Transit more than Lena.

There is not a voting paradox and the outcomes will be consistent.

There is a voting paradox that will result in inconsistent outcomes.