9. T devises property to X in trust to pay so much of the income and principal to A as X determines is necessary for A's comfortable support and maintenance. A is insolvent. X refuses to make a distribution to A. B, an ordinary creditor of A, sues X on the theory that, because A is insolvent, it is an abuse of discretion for X not to make a distribution to A, and thus B is entitled to stand in A's shoes and compel that distribution. What result under traditional law? What result under UTC 504