A large shareholder owned furniture company known for its trendy, but low-priced merchandise has been the...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
A large shareholder owned furniture company known for its trendy, but low-priced merchandise has been the target of criticism for its environmental practices. For example, an article an influential newspaper called out the company for its mass-produced furniture that is both "easy to obtain (inexpensive) and abandon (not built to last)." The company's labor practices have also been called into question. Recently, the company has taken what seem to be significant steps toward becoming more socially and ecologically responsible. The company's CEO affirmed the Business Roundtable's Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation (which states that businesses should create value for all stakeholders) and has joined over 200 companies in signing "The Climate Pledge," (a pledge to achieve "Net Zero Carbon" by 2040). In addition to promising better treatment of employees and other workers in its supply chain, the company features several prominently stated environmental goals and activities on its website including aspirations to become net carbon zero, using a high percentage of sustainable materials, etc. These initiatives will be costly to implement. However, some company executives have been encouraged by various reports that seem to indicate a strong business case for creating value for multiple stakeholders. More specifically, they have become aware of surveys in which a significant percentage of "aspirational consumers" worldwide state they only buy from companies that align with their social and environmental values. Moreover, these consumers indicate they are willing to pay higher prices in order to "shop their values." Executives are also aware of the fast-growing ESG (Environment, Social & Governance) investing movement. Based on this information, some members of the executive team believe that the company will not only recoup any additional costs, but will actually increase its profits and share price through attracting customers and socially/ ecologically minded investors. Should executives continue and even expand these efforts based on the presumption that higher profit and improving society are in essential alignment? Why or why not? In other words, how strong is the business case for becoming more stakeholder/sustainability oriented? The furniture company in Question 1 features the following environmental aspirations prominently on its website, social media accounts and promotional messaging: 1) Achieve "net carbon zero" in by 2040. 2) Manufacture with 98% sustainable materials within 5 years (now at 80%). 3) A soon to launch website featuring real time monitoring and reporting of the company's progress toward its stated environmental goals. While these goals seem noble, what should we consider in determining whether they are legitimate ways to advance the goals of sustainability? Explain. A large shareholder owned furniture company known for its trendy, but low-priced merchandise has been the target of criticism for its environmental practices. For example, an article an influential newspaper called out the company for its mass-produced furniture that is both "easy to obtain (inexpensive) and abandon (not built to last)." The company's labor practices have also been called into question. Recently, the company has taken what seem to be significant steps toward becoming more socially and ecologically responsible. The company's CEO affirmed the Business Roundtable's Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation (which states that businesses should create value for all stakeholders) and has joined over 200 companies in signing "The Climate Pledge," (a pledge to achieve "Net Zero Carbon" by 2040). In addition to promising better treatment of employees and other workers in its supply chain, the company features several prominently stated environmental goals and activities on its website including aspirations to become net carbon zero, using a high percentage of sustainable materials, etc. These initiatives will be costly to implement. However, some company executives have been encouraged by various reports that seem to indicate a strong business case for creating value for multiple stakeholders. More specifically, they have become aware of surveys in which a significant percentage of "aspirational consumers" worldwide state they only buy from companies that align with their social and environmental values. Moreover, these consumers indicate they are willing to pay higher prices in order to "shop their values." Executives are also aware of the fast-growing ESG (Environment, Social & Governance) investing movement. Based on this information, some members of the executive team believe that the company will not only recoup any additional costs, but will actually increase its profits and share price through attracting customers and socially/ ecologically minded investors. Should executives continue and even expand these efforts based on the presumption that higher profit and improving society are in essential alignment? Why or why not? In other words, how strong is the business case for becoming more stakeholder/sustainability oriented? The furniture company in Question 1 features the following environmental aspirations prominently on its website, social media accounts and promotional messaging: 1) Achieve "net carbon zero" in by 2040. 2) Manufacture with 98% sustainable materials within 5 years (now at 80%). 3) A soon to launch website featuring real time monitoring and reporting of the company's progress toward its stated environmental goals. While these goals seem noble, what should we consider in determining whether they are legitimate ways to advance the goals of sustainability? Explain.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
The executives of the furniture company have a significant opportunity to align their business strategy with social and environmental values which can potentially lead to both increased profits and po... View the full answer
Related Book For
International Marketing And Export Management
ISBN: 9781292016924
8th Edition
Authors: Gerald Albaum , Alexander Josiassen , Edwin Duerr
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
Googles ease of use and superior search results have propelled the search engine to its num- ber one status, ousting the early dominance of competitors such as WebCrawler and Infos- eek. Even later...
-
Planning is one of the most important management functions in any business. A front office managers first step in planning should involve determine the departments goals. Planning also includes...
-
Describe the Spanish Theocratic Rule during Spain's colonial era in the Philippines?
-
Prove that if A is an m n matrix, there is an invertible matrix C such that CA is in reduced row-echelon form.
-
Divide the numerator and the denominator of each fraction by the given factor and obtain an equivalent fraction. 4xy 8.xy (by 2x)
-
How many forms of main() are there?
-
Picasso Restoration Company completed the following selected transactions during May 2014: May 1. Established a petty cash fund of $800. 10. The cash sales for the day, according to the cash register...
-
The given code snippet is implemented using linear probing technique, what change you have to make so that the quadratic probing is implemented. @Override public boolean put(String word, String...
-
For financial reporting, Clinton Poultry Farms has used the declining-balance method of depreciation for conveyor equipment acquired at the beginning of 2018 for $2,880,000. Its useful life was...
-
How can I create a constructive environment where employees feel safe to express their pain and grief?
-
Why do some followers continue to support dark leaders even though they know that such leaders are immoral, destructive, and unethical?
-
How does yoga differ from other approaches to support leadership development, well-being, and inclusivity?
-
Was Marcus Aurelius a great leader? Why and why not? What was his most important leadership trait?
-
How can self-developing employees help an organization to stay relevant, given the speed at which technology evolves?
-
On April 1, 2010, Shannon Company, a U.S. company, borrowed 100,000 euros from a foreign bank by signing an interest-bearing note due April 1, 2011. The dollar value of the loan was as follows: Date...
-
Activator rod AB exerts on crank BCD a force P directed along line AB. Knowing that P must have a 100-N component perpendicular to arm BC of the crank, determine (a) The magnitude of the force P, (b)...
-
Crane l uses 10 kJ of energy to lift a 50 kg box to the roof of a building. Crane 2 uses 20 kl to lift a 100 kg box the same distance. Which crane is more efficient? A. Crane 1 B. Crane 2 C. Both...
-
Christina throws a javelin into the air. As she propels it forward from rest, she does 270 J of work on it. At its highest point, its gravitational potential energy has increased by 70 J. What is the...
-
Two samples of ideal gas, sample 1 and sample 2, have the same thermal energy. Sample l has twice as many atoms as sample 2. What can we say about the temperatures of the two samples? A. T>T B. T = T...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App