A potential client ('Joe ) has come to you and presented a set of facts . Draft a client "Evaluation letter" for Joe Summarizing the relevant facts and opinion of his case including each required component of a client correspondence and making sure employing proper formatting.

JOE v. AUTO WORKS

On July 14, 2005, Joe, age 64, a semi -retired bartender, entered Auto works to shop for some auto parts for his 1969 Studebaker. He had been in the had been in the store about 10-12 minutes when he located the set of spark plugs he wanted. Joe proceeded to the checkout stand to pay for the items. He does not recall how long he stood in the line to pay the cashier. He paid for the items, turned to go out of the store, and tripped over a small plastics, wastebasket which Joe states was in the aisle. He did not see the wastebasket at any time prior to the falling.

Joe suffered injuries in his neck, his shoulders. his left arm, his left hand. his lower back, and his left knee. He was treated primarily by a chiropractor who charged him a total of $ 3,843.80. He also went to an Orthopedic surgeon for an evaluation and had an MRI taken which showed a small bulge in the L8-L9 vertebras. The surgeon charged him $3,156.20 for this service. Joe continues to complain of pain in his neck, his left arm, lower back. and his left knee.

Factual Synopsis:

On July 14, 2005, Joe, age 64, a semi-retired bartender, entered Auto works to shop for some auto parts for his 1969 Studebaker. He had been in the had been in the store about 10-12 minutes when he located the set of spark plugs he wanted. Joe proceeded to the checkout stand to pay for the items. He does not recall how long he stood in the line to pay the cashier. He does not recall how long he stood in the line to pay the cashier. He paid for the items, turned to go out of the store, and tripped over a small plastics, wastebasket which Joe states was in the aisle. He did not see the wastebasket at any time prior to the falling.

Joe suffered injuries in his neck, his shoulders. his left arm, his left hand. his lower back, and his left knee. He was treated primarily by a chiropractor who charged him a total of $ 3,843.80. He also went to an Orthopedic surgeon for an evaluation and had an MRI taken which showed a small bulge in the L8-L9 vertebras. The surgeon charged him $3,156.20 for this service. Joe continues to complain of pain in his neck, his left arm, lower back. and his left knee.

Applicable Law:

Joes' cause of action against Auto works is for negligence. To establish a claim for negligence, there must be 1)a duty 2)breach of that duty 3) Causation and 4) damages. here the shopkeeper has a duty to keep his store safe for customers. The shopkeeper breached that duty to by leaving a wastebasket in the aisle. As a result of that breach of duty, Joe tripped and fell. Lastly, Joe suffered damages. Therefore, all of the elements of negligence are present in this case.

Joe can successfully maintain that the shopkeeper has a duty to his customers to provide a safe harbor for shopping. by placing the wastebasket in the aisle, the shopkeepers conduct fell below the standard of care for shopkeepers. Furthermore, the injuries suffered by Joe were directly and proximately caused by the negligence of the shopkeeper.

It could be argued by Auto works that Joe was treated excessively and that, as a result, the medical expenses did not all result from the accident. However, Joe sought treatment from a Chiropractor and reasonably relied upon the chiropractor's medical opinions. He felt some marginal benefit from the treatments and continued until released by that Chiropractor. Because he continued to haver pain, he sought the opinion pf another expert, an orthopedic surgeon. This. again, seems to be reasonable act.

we therefore conclude that Joe has a viable cause of action against Auto works for Negligence and recommend that joe seeks damages to include his medical bill costs in the sum of $ 7,500 and an additional amount of $15,000 for pain and suffering.

Uunivers'rty first year BUSINESS LAW - Introduction to company law Chapter 1.5 Introduction to company law Short Answer Questions [end of chapter p 432}: 1., 2. 4 and 5 Why is a director considered to be a fiduciary? Explain 1ivhat is meant by the duty to act 1ivitl'. due care, skill and diligence. 4L Briey explain what a related party transaction ls, why disclosure ls required at board level and why member approval of the transaction ls required. 5. Why does an Insolvent company or a com parry nearing Insolvency have to consider the Interests of creditors when making decisions conoemlng the allocation of company resources? Question 3 What are the differences between right issues and bonus issues? Your answer should include the advantages and disadvantages of both right issues and bonus issues. [8 marks] Question 4 The Companies Act 2016 repealed the Companies Act 1965 and changed the landscape of company law in Malaysia. The Companies Act 2016 reformed almost all aspects of company law in Malaysia. Required: By referring to the Companies Act 2016, insert the correct sections in column (A) for each description in column B. LUAccording to China's Company law, who of the following persons could be eligible for appointment as a director, supervisor or senior manager of a company? A. A person who has been convicted crime of corruption B. A physical disabled person who has full civil capacity C. A former director of a company which has been declared bankrupt where he was personally responsible for the bankruptcy D. A person who has significant unpaid debts. 8. Which of the following FIE forms is not a legal person? A. CJV B.EJV soon mug rancor C. Branch office D.IHC how of viilids and beat vilsing aved of bermilos ed or ontolyons set . 9. According to China's company law, a company may not purchase its own shares in which of the following circumstances! A. to reduce the registered capital B. to merge with another company that holds its shares C. to reward the staff of the company with shares of D. to escape some tax Page 2 7 pages in totalHow would you ensurethat your risk management processes talce into account the following legislation, codes of practice and national standards? Briefly describe eacJ'i legislation. Provide a practical example for each legislation of what n'slt action you your own works, summarize: 1irirould take that takes into account'ie legislation. .1 Duty of care l1 Company law c Contract law d Environmental law e. Freedom of information f. Industrial relations law g Privacy and condentiality l'L Competition and Consumer Law i. Disability law