A software development team is designing a messaging system where messages are processed in the order they are received. To manage the messages, the team decides to implement a queue. However, the system needs to handle high$-$priority messages $($marked as "urgent"$)$ more quickly than standard messages. The team proposes using two separate queues: one for standard messages and another for urgent messages. The processing algorithm works as follows:

Check the urgent message queue; if it is not empty, process the next message from this queue.

If the urgent message queue is empty, process the next message from the standard message queue.

Repeat this process, ensuring that all urgent messages are processed before any standard messages.

Which of the following statements accurately reflects a characteristic or potential issue with this approach?

Question $4$ options:

Implementing two queues for message processing simplifies the system design by eliminating the need to dynamically adjust the priority of messages within a single queue, thus reducing computational overhead.

By separating messages into two queues based on priority, the system can significantly reduce the response time for urgent messages but may increase the waiting time for standard messages during periods of high urgent message volume.

The proposed system risks starvation of standard messages, where they could be indefinitely delayed if a continuous stream of urgent messages is received.

This system efficiently ensures that all messages, regardless of priority, are processed in a strictly First$-$Come, First$-$Served $($FCFS$)$ manner, aligning with the team's requirements for fair message processing.