1. a) Which principle do you prefer: equality of opportunity OR equality of outcome? Why? (Meaning to say, what is *one thing that you like most about this principle?)
3. 
   
5. 
   
7. Equality of opportunity is the idea that everyone should have the same chances to succeed in life, regardless of their background, social status, or any other factor beyond their control. The main advantage of this principle is that it promotes meritocracy and encourages people to work hard and develop their talents, knowing that their efforts will be rewarded based on their abilities and skills, not their race, gender, or other factors.
9. 
   
11. On the other hand, equality of outcome is the idea that everyone should have the same results or benefits in life, regardless of their individual efforts, talents, or choices. The main advantage of this principle is that it ensures a more equal distribution of resources, opportunities, and power, reducing the gaps and disparities between the haves and have-nots in society.
13. 
    
15. 
    
17. b) What is the strongest criticism from the opposing principle about this *one thing that you like most?
19. 
    
21. The strongest criticism of equality of opportunity is that it assumes that everyone starts from the same level playing field, which is not the case in reality. Many people are born into disadvantaged or marginalized groups that face systemic barriers and discrimination, such as poverty, racism, sexism, or ableism. Therefore, even if they have the same potential and motivation as others, they may not have the same opportunities to access education, healthcare, housing, jobs, or other resources that are essential for success.
23. 
    
25. The strongest criticism of equality of outcome is that it undermines individual freedom and responsibility, and may lead to mediocrity or inefficiency. If everyone is guaranteed the same outcomes, regardless of their efforts or abilities, there is no incentive for people to strive for excellence or innovation. Moreover, it may be unfair to reward those who are less capable or less productive at the expense of those who are more capable or more productive, as it may demotivate the latter and create resentment and disengagement.
27. 
    
29. c) What would be your response to this criticism to defend or justify the principle that you chose?
31. 
    
33. 
    
35. To defend the principle of equality of opportunity, one could argue that while it may not be possible to eliminate all forms of inequality and disadvantage, it is still important to strive towards a more level playing field, and to provide targeted support and interventions for those who face the greatest barriers. For instance, affirmative action programs, scholarships, mentorship, and community outreach can help to address some of the systemic factors that limit access and opportunities for marginalized groups. Moreover, the principle of equality of opportunity can coexist with other principles, such as fairness, justice, and compassion, as long as they are balanced and applied in a consistent and transparent manner.
37. 
    
39. 
    
41. To defend the principle of equality of outcome, one could argue that it is not about guaranteeing the same results for everyone, but rather about ensuring that everyone has a minimum standard of living and dignity, and that no one is left behind or excluded from the benefits of society. Moreover, the principle of equality of outcome can coexist with other principles, such as meritocracy, efficiency, and innovation, as long as they are not used to justify or perpetuate inequality or discrimination. Finally, one could argue that the best way to achieve a more equal and just society is to combine different principles and strategies, and to adapt them to the specific context and needs of each community.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

a Im inclined towards the principle of equality of opportunity One thing I appreciate about it is it... View the full answer