Compare and contrast the 2 episodes and critically analyze them.

PODCAST 1: The Mallen Baker Podcast

POSCAST 2: Good News To Go: Corporate Social Responsibility

Answer the following questions:

1. What were the different points of view presented during each episode?
2. Was one episode stronger than the other? Why?
3. What made the conversation or argument more effective than the other?
4. What would have made the "weaker" conversation or argument stronger or more effective?
5. What information is missing from the conversations?
6. If you were the host of your own podcast, what questions would you ask each of these guests?