Additional premises needed to make it valid or strong $($if none, say so$)$:

Classify $($with the additional premises$)$: valid OR strong

weak

Good argument? $($Choose one and give an explanation.$)$

It's good $($passes the three tests$).$

It's valid or strong, but you don't know if the premises are true, so you can't say if it's good or bad.

It's bad because it's unrepairable $($state which of the reasons apply$).$

c$)$ No cat barks. So Ralph is not a cat.

Argument?$($yes$/$no$)$

Conclusion $($if unstated, add it$)$:

Premises:

Additional premises needed to make it valid or strong $($if none, say so$)$:

Classify $($with the additional premises$)$: valid OR strong weak

Good argument? $($Choose one and give an explanation.$)$

It's good $($passes the three tests$).$

It's valid or strong, but you don't know if the premises are true, so you can't say if it's good or bad.

It's bad because it's unrepairable $($state which of the reasons apply$).$

The following conversation is ascribed to W$.$ C$.$ Fields at a formal dinner party. What can we say he implied?

W$.$ C$.$ Fields: Madame, you are horribly ugly.

Lady: Your behavior is inexcusable. You're drunk.

W$.$ C$.$ Fields: I may be drunk, but tomorrow I'll be sober.