Air and Noise Pollution Homework The homework problems require students to communicate their understanding of key concepts, as well as their ability to interpret numerical calculations relevant to air and noise pollution and its control. By completing homework, students demonstrate their ability to explain concepts relevant to air and noise pollution engineering, apply their knowledge of air and noise pollution to engineering problems, and communicate technical engineering concepts in a clear and concise manner. Homework Task: A summary narrative of no more than 3500 words that connects the outputs, concepts and overall information from all seminars and the virtual field trip. In developing your summary, you should concentrate on adding value and demonstrating learning beyond the individual content of each component from the seminars. Seminar Summaries should be between 200-500 words per seminar (longer summaries for longer seminars). Also, as a part of your summary for each seminar, describe in a few sentences how you think this information will influence or impact upon your work in your prospective career of choice. Summaries will be graded for the presence and quality of the following: - Capturing the main principles and concepts accurately - Clarity and precision of the summary - Demonstrated understanding beyond the content - articulation of professional capacities Outstanding Exceeds Expectations Competent Meets expectations Below expectations Theory based The summaries Relevant key theories Information is The information Key theories and analysis exceptionally cover the are presented, with informative, with several | presented was a brief information relating to key theories and some evidence of elements still required. look, but majority of the subject are poorly concepts relating to the | evaluation and synthesis | The extent and quality of | information was described, with limited seminars. the information needs to | irrelevant or superficial connections to the be improved with significant points subject. left out. ) I Evaluation and Sophisticated critical Considerable ability to Adequate ability to Limited ability to reflect | Limited or no critical Career Reflection | reflection on the content | reflect on the reflect on the on the implications of reflection on the (20%) and its implications for implications of the implications of the the seminar content and | experience and its the individual's career. seminar content and its | seminar content and its | its implications for the implications Several insights drawn implications for the implications for the individual's career. from the individual individual's career. Some | individual's career. Superficial insights learning and insights drawn from the | Limited insights drawn drawn from the understanding individual learning and from the individual individual learning and developed understanding learning and understanding developed understanding developed developed Clarity of writing Very clear and well Most ideas are generally | Some ideas are clearly Significant problems Ideas and points are (20%) crafted sentencgs with FlearAIV erxpressed and its | expressed. Writing with clarirty, coherence difficult to N an excellent logical implications for the generally coherent, but | and consistency. comprehend. Writing presentation throughout | future career of choice. some poorly organised Paragraphs poorly does not make sense, the entire assessment. Insights drawn from the | or focused. Some organised or unfocused. | and is fraught with Demonstrated a higher individual learning problems with sentence | Poor word choices. mistakes and misuse of level of accurate use of construction and word language language and phrasing choice