All the next questions are based on Zimpfer v$.$Palm Beach County

$1.$ Was Mr$.$ Zimpfer a victim of illegal age discrimination according to the ADEA and case law? Why or why not? Cite relevant court cases to justify your position.

$2.$ What $($if any$)$ further evidence should be ascertained before the county fully understands the legal implications of its actions?

$3.$ What action do you recommend that the county take in this matter?

$4.$ What policies should the county adopt to reduce the possibility of age discrimination suits in the future?

$5.$ In the same year that Zimpfer was rejected, Palm Beach County filled only $4$ percent of managerial positions with persons over $55$ years of age and only $16$ percent with persons over $39.$ Does this data indicate illegal discrimination using disparate impact theory? Should Zimpfer$$s lawyer use disparate impact theory for his claim of age discrimination? Is Palm Beach County vulnerable to a future ADEA lawsuit using a disparate impact theory? What critical Supreme Court ruling is relevant to this question?