An agent with no express, implied, or apparent authority to do so identified himself as an agent for his principal, and on behalf of his principal bought a computer. The principal refused to ratify the contract. On these facts, which of the following is true?

Select one:

a$.$

A third party cannot sue an agent even under these circumstances.

b$.$

The principal would have to pay for the computer because the agent was an agent for that principal.

c$.$

The agent could be sued by the seller of the computer for breach of his warranty of authority.

d$.$

The seller could sue the principal for breach of warranty of authority.

e$.$

The seller of the computer could sue the agent for breach of contract for saying he was an agent.