Question: An article in JAMA by Mandelblatt and colleagues (2002) compared the societal costs and benefits of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, Pap testing, and their combination
An article in JAMA by Mandelblatt and colleagues (2002) compared the societal costs and benefits of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, Pap testing, and their combination to screen for cervical cancer. The paper studied 18 different population screening strategies- Pap testing alone, HPV testing alone, and Pap plus HPV testing every 2 or 3 years for women beginning at age 20 and continuing to 65 years, 75 years and death. The table below summarizes some of the results (low cost to high cost) Costs include screening and treatment costs, discounted over the individuals expected lifetime.
| Strategy | Cost ($) | QALYs Saved | Incremental cost | Incremental QALY | ICER |
| 5,000 | 26.87 |
|
|
|
| 6,825 | 27.02 |
|
|
|
| 6,950 | 27.02 |
|
|
|
| 7,275 | 27.04 |
|
|
|
| 7,400 | 27.04 |
|
|
|
| 7,450 | 27.04 |
|
|
|
| 7,925 | 27.05 |
|
|
|
- Identify all dominant screening strategies. Explain why each is dominant
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
