An Expert Witness can be anyone with knowledge or experience of a particular field or discipline...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
An Expert Witness can be anyone with knowledge or experience of a particular field or discipline beyond that to be expected of a layman. The Expert Witness's duty is to give to the Court or tribunal an impartial opinion on particular aspects of matters within his expertise which are in dispute. In England & Wales and many other jurisdictions the Court must give permission for an Expert Witness to give evidence. An Expert Witness is not an expert adviser who is normally appointed by a party to assist in the formulation and preparation of a party's claim or defence. An expert adviser does not have an overriding duty to the court but to the party instructing him. The primary function of an expert witness is to express his independent expert opinion based on the information that is provided. An expert can be employed in different capacities for example at arbitrations, tribunals, and litigation. A witness is a person giving sworn evidence to a tribunal or court of law. There are basically two types of witness: • Witnesses of Fact who may give evidence of fact but may not normally give opinions: • Expert Witnesses who may give opinion evidence within their expertise and in addition evidence of facts. CASE: Copyright Expert Witness Excluded for Lack of Expertise Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division Jurisdiction: Federal Case Name: Durkin v. Platz Citation: 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13953 The plaintiffs and defendants partnered to write a screenplay. However, the contract between the two parties was being debated. The defendants brought a copyright expert who stated that the plaintiffs' additions were not sufficient enough. The court granted the plaintiffs' motion to exclude the copyright expert. The court explained the expert's background was inadequate and therefore, the expert could not be an authoritative voice on the topic Facts Desiring to turn their unpublished manuscript into a film, defendants decided to join forces with plaintiffs. The plaintiffs had expertise in the film business and had recently formed a production company. The parties entered a contract that the plaintiffs would write a screenplay. The parties now disputed the scope of the agreement. The contract showed the parties intentions to produce a movie based on the screenplay. They claimed the defendants had breached the contract and fiduciary duty by not adapting the screenplay. Defendants claimed the contract was only for writing a contract, and they had fulfilled their obligation by paying the plaintiffs for the screenplay. The Defendant Copyright Expert Witness The defendants's copyright expert witness was an English professor who specialized in rhetoric, literature, and linguistics. The copyright expert witness was the founder CEO of an academic publishing company. He has written on the teaching and nature of literature and writing, literary and film analysis, ethics, and research methodology. He has also written about plagiarism, copyright, and adapting works of literature into films. The defendants hired the copyright expert witness to evaluate the copyright ability of the plaintiffs' screenplay. When deciding whether the film was copyrightable, the copyright expert examined whether the plaintiffs made significant additions to the novel. Throughout his study, he described a substantial change. Substantial changes would have to be at the scene-level. This includes a main character or a narrative occurrence that would modify the viewer's/reader's perception of the concept of the novel. By making those changes, this would be making a different interpretation from that given by the [defendants'] text. He clarified the replacement of a word or the rearrangement of dialogues did not amount to being significant additions. The dramatization of thoughts as action sequences in the screenplay was also insufficient. Discussion Plaintiffs argued the proposed expert was not an expert in copyright law and thus, should not be permitted to testify. Defendants countered that any perceived weakness in the testimony can be addressed during cross-examination. The court noted that the defendants failed to identify credentials that make the expert an authority in copyright law. While the copyright expert was a specialist in plagiarism, neither his professional study nor CV indicated any experience in copyright law. The expert report stated that he struggled with copyright issues in his capacity as CEO of his publishing company. However, the court noted that this hardly made the expert an authority in the area of copyright law. The court concluded that he was not qualified to testify as a copyright expert witness. The court noted that derivative work need not change the focus or theme interpretation to be considered copyrightable. Such a standard, the court felt, would often negate the very aim of the idea for works considered as derivatives. Here, the defendants wanted a screenplay based on their manuscript. It seemed unlikely to the court that, by changing the format of their narrative from novel to film, the defendants expected the plaintiffs to change the theme and focus of their writing. The court further noted the expert's proposed testimony was unreliable because he did not apply the standard with respect to copyright law based on the extent of nontrivial alterations. This standard was outlined in Schrock v. Learning Curve International, Inc. Instead, he used his own. The court noted the product of an unqualified expert using unreliable methodology was an irrelevant expert opinion. The copyright expert witness's testimony was irrelevant according to the court, for two reasons. First, it came to a conclusion on a matter that was not at issue. Second, it dealt with a pure question of law and would therefore not assist the jury. Ruling Plaintiff's motion to exclude was granted. REQUIRED: Comment and critically analyze the following areas in a memorandum format to your senior legal advisor. a) Based on the case above, present the role of direct examination in expert witness testimony? Why there is a change in opinion from the experts and what would be your recommendation? b) Legal terminology distinguishes between "lay" (as in clergy and laity) and "expert" witnesses. The difference between the two is expressed very simply in Rule 701 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). Discuss the points of FRE Rule 701 and 702. c) Write a brief finding for the case of Carmichael v. Kumho Tire Company (1998) and report on the judgment of this case. You should also include the law regarding "Expert Witness" based on the Malaysian Law Act and discuss the law. - Students are encouraged to do comparisons. You can enhance your discussion with case laws where necessary. An Expert Witness can be anyone with knowledge or experience of a particular field or discipline beyond that to be expected of a layman. The Expert Witness's duty is to give to the Court or tribunal an impartial opinion on particular aspects of matters within his expertise which are in dispute. In England & Wales and many other jurisdictions the Court must give permission for an Expert Witness to give evidence. An Expert Witness is not an expert adviser who is normally appointed by a party to assist in the formulation and preparation of a party's claim or defence. An expert adviser does not have an overriding duty to the court but to the party instructing him. The primary function of an expert witness is to express his independent expert opinion based on the information that is provided. An expert can be employed in different capacities for example at arbitrations, tribunals, and litigation. A witness is a person giving sworn evidence to a tribunal or court of law. There are basically two types of witness: • Witnesses of Fact who may give evidence of fact but may not normally give opinions: • Expert Witnesses who may give opinion evidence within their expertise and in addition evidence of facts. CASE: Copyright Expert Witness Excluded for Lack of Expertise Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division Jurisdiction: Federal Case Name: Durkin v. Platz Citation: 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13953 The plaintiffs and defendants partnered to write a screenplay. However, the contract between the two parties was being debated. The defendants brought a copyright expert who stated that the plaintiffs' additions were not sufficient enough. The court granted the plaintiffs' motion to exclude the copyright expert. The court explained the expert's background was inadequate and therefore, the expert could not be an authoritative voice on the topic Facts Desiring to turn their unpublished manuscript into a film, defendants decided to join forces with plaintiffs. The plaintiffs had expertise in the film business and had recently formed a production company. The parties entered a contract that the plaintiffs would write a screenplay. The parties now disputed the scope of the agreement. The contract showed the parties intentions to produce a movie based on the screenplay. They claimed the defendants had breached the contract and fiduciary duty by not adapting the screenplay. Defendants claimed the contract was only for writing a contract, and they had fulfilled their obligation by paying the plaintiffs for the screenplay. The Defendant Copyright Expert Witness The defendants's copyright expert witness was an English professor who specialized in rhetoric, literature, and linguistics. The copyright expert witness was the founder CEO of an academic publishing company. He has written on the teaching and nature of literature and writing, literary and film analysis, ethics, and research methodology. He has also written about plagiarism, copyright, and adapting works of literature into films. The defendants hired the copyright expert witness to evaluate the copyright ability of the plaintiffs' screenplay. When deciding whether the film was copyrightable, the copyright expert examined whether the plaintiffs made significant additions to the novel. Throughout his study, he described a substantial change. Substantial changes would have to be at the scene-level. This includes a main character or a narrative occurrence that would modify the viewer's/reader's perception of the concept of the novel. By making those changes, this would be making a different interpretation from that given by the [defendants'] text. He clarified the replacement of a word or the rearrangement of dialogues did not amount to being significant additions. The dramatization of thoughts as action sequences in the screenplay was also insufficient. Discussion Plaintiffs argued the proposed expert was not an expert in copyright law and thus, should not be permitted to testify. Defendants countered that any perceived weakness in the testimony can be addressed during cross-examination. The court noted that the defendants failed to identify credentials that make the expert an authority in copyright law. While the copyright expert was a specialist in plagiarism, neither his professional study nor CV indicated any experience in copyright law. The expert report stated that he struggled with copyright issues in his capacity as CEO of his publishing company. However, the court noted that this hardly made the expert an authority in the area of copyright law. The court concluded that he was not qualified to testify as a copyright expert witness. The court noted that derivative work need not change the focus or theme interpretation to be considered copyrightable. Such a standard, the court felt, would often negate the very aim of the idea for works considered as derivatives. Here, the defendants wanted a screenplay based on their manuscript. It seemed unlikely to the court that, by changing the format of their narrative from novel to film, the defendants expected the plaintiffs to change the theme and focus of their writing. The court further noted the expert's proposed testimony was unreliable because he did not apply the standard with respect to copyright law based on the extent of nontrivial alterations. This standard was outlined in Schrock v. Learning Curve International, Inc. Instead, he used his own. The court noted the product of an unqualified expert using unreliable methodology was an irrelevant expert opinion. The copyright expert witness's testimony was irrelevant according to the court, for two reasons. First, it came to a conclusion on a matter that was not at issue. Second, it dealt with a pure question of law and would therefore not assist the jury. Ruling Plaintiff's motion to exclude was granted. REQUIRED: Comment and critically analyze the following areas in a memorandum format to your senior legal advisor. a) Based on the case above, present the role of direct examination in expert witness testimony? Why there is a change in opinion from the experts and what would be your recommendation? b) Legal terminology distinguishes between "lay" (as in clergy and laity) and "expert" witnesses. The difference between the two is expressed very simply in Rule 701 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). Discuss the points of FRE Rule 701 and 702. c) Write a brief finding for the case of Carmichael v. Kumho Tire Company (1998) and report on the judgment of this case. You should also include the law regarding "Expert Witness" based on the Malaysian Law Act and discuss the law. - Students are encouraged to do comparisons. You can enhance your discussion with case laws where necessary.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
a The role of direct examination in expert witness testimony is to elicit information from the witness that is relevant to the case Direct examination is used to present the experts qualifications and ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Forensic Accounting
ISBN: 978-0133050479
1st Edition
Authors: Robert Rufus, Laura Miller, William Hahn
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these programming questions
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
Planning is one of the most important management functions in any business. A front office managers first step in planning should involve determine the departments goals. Planning also includes...
-
Googles ease of use and superior search results have propelled the search engine to its num- ber one status, ousting the early dominance of competitors such as WebCrawler and Infos- eek. Even later...
-
A list of all of the raw materials needed to manufacture a job. Question 5 options: Bill of Materials Job costing Job cost record Question 6 (1 point) A system for assigning costs to products or...
-
How can organizations use social networking to connect with their customers?
-
Akiko, a mobile Vegan caf, in London sells wraps, bowls, and burgers. It employs two sandwich artists to assemble the wraps as per customer requests. The cafs current daily labor cost is 160, the...
-
For each of the following sets of numbers, calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean ( \(\sigma\) not known); before going through the steps in calculating the confidence interval, the...
-
Ethylene glycol flows at 0.0 I kg/s through a 3-mm-diameter, thin-walled tube. The tube is coiled and sub-merged in a well-stirred water bath maintained at 25C. If the fluid enters the tube at 85C,...
-
@ Consider y defined as a function of x by the equation: Ax+By+C=0 If A, B and C are constants, show that the graph of y is a straight line. What happens when B=0? Note that we say that the locus of...
-
Based on the information in The Art of Positive Communication EL. a TedTalk by Julien Mirivel, Answer the following questions: 1) Name and give a brief example for each of the 6 positive...
-
Please help me get the latest Russia's information in the year 2022-2023. In sentences please on the below bullets. 1. inflation 2. unemployment rate and public debt 3. How high are corporate taxes...
-
You are building an instrument to measure the orientation of Earth's magnetic field. Your device consists of a single conducting coil that encloses an area \(A=400 \mathrm{~mm}^{2}\) and rotates at a...
-
What instances of athlete activism have you witnessed since this chapter was published? How do they differ from Kaepernicks protest? To what degree have the maintenance of athletes reputations and/or...
-
Frances paid income tax and Class 4 NICs of 47,000 for tax year 2019-20, of which 19,000 was paid via the PAYE system. Her total liability for 2020-21 is 69,000, of which 21,000 is paid via PAYE. Her...
-
The current through an inductor of inductance \(L\) is given by \(I(t)=I_{\max } \sin (\omega t)\). (a) Derive an expression for the induced emf in the inductor as a function of time. (b) At \(t=0\),...
-
An article in the New York Post placed some of the blame on Maria Taylor for not working with Rachel Nichols after her recorded comments to come to a satisfactory resolution. What do you think?...
-
Suppose thread A goes through a loop 100 times, each time performing (i) one disk I/O operation, taking 10 milliseconds, and then (ii) some computation, taking 1 millisecond. While each...
-
The diameter of a sphere is 18 in. Find the largest volume of regular pyramid of altitude 15 in. that can be cut from the sphere if the pyramid is (a) square, (b) pentagonal, (c) hexagonal, and (d)...
-
Go to the AICPA web site and review the document entitled Characteristics and Skills of the Forensic Accountant. Identify the top five characteristics or skills as identified by attorneys, and...
-
The ZZZZ Best fraud resulted in the Treadway Commission report on Fraudulent Financial Re-porting (1987) as an attempt to reform areas that fostered frauds of the type perpetrated by Minkow. Go to...
-
Compare and contrast a valuation engagement with a calculation engagement.
-
Dawson Industries began operations early in January 2024. On 31 December 2024, records showed the following asset, liability, equity, income and expense amounts: Required (a) Prepare a statement of...
-
Tiffany established The Marketing Store, an Instagram management business on 1 January 2024 as a sole trader business. She contributed $10 000 in cash to the business and did not withdraw funds for...
-
A new business graduate with one subject of accounting prepared the financial statements below for Amirs Delivery Service at the end of the first year of operations. Additional analysis revealed the...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App