Answer ALL and receive a like!

PART I: INSTRUCTIONS. PLEASE READ. Using an HB pencil or ball-point pen only, fill complotely the numbered arcle and/or write your response in the designated area corresponding to each statement. All responses are voluntary and anenymous. Results will be avallable to the instructor only after final course marks have been submitted. The inlormation obtained from these questions may be used as stipulated by Memorials Policies and the MUNMUNFA Collective Agreement and published in printed and electronic form for access by students. Course Name and Number: Section Number: 1. The student requirements in the course were clear 2. The instructor responded to students' questions effectively 3. The instructor showed concern for how well students progressed in the course. 4. The instructor stimulated my interest in learning the subject matter of the course.. 5. Students were given constructive feedback on written work, L.e., assignments and exams . 6. Overall the course was well organized 7. I would recommend this course taught by this instructor to another student with interests and preparation similar to my own even if it was not required B. Overall the quality of instruction was 9. Compared to other courses at the same level (e.9., all 2000 level courses you have taken) the workload was: Since all of you have some knowledge of course evaluation questionnaires (CEQs) for professors, consider these as an example of a performance appraisal. Without getting into examples of particular professors, discuss the following aspects of the CEQ. Make sure to also comment on at least one of your group member's posts. A 1. What type of performance appraisal method does the CEQ represent? 2. Are the items on the CEQ a good representation of the skills, knowledge, and abilities required to be an instructor for a course? 3. What changes would you make to the CEQ in order for it to be more effective? (It is very important that you use the chapter material to help you defend your answer here.)