Answer the following questions using the relevant case precedents and legislations WITH A LOT OF DETAIL

The relevant Textbook to use when answering the questions :Equity & trusts in Australia.

Bryan, Michael, author.Vann, V. J., author.Third edition / M W Bryan, V J Vann, S Barkehall Thomas.Cambridge, United Kingdom ;Cambridge University Press2023 - 2023

Use these examples of which best applies to the following scenario or any other that best apply to the answers of the questions :

Sourcebook:

• Dougan v Ley, 3.2.1.2
• Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores,3.2.2.1a
• ABC v Lenah Game Meats, 3.3.1a
• Curo v Beyond Productions, 3.3.4a
• Black Uhlans Incorporated v NSW Crimes Commission, 6.4a
• Giumelli v Giumelli6.6a
• Textbook: Ch 9; Ch 15.5-15.8.
• Sourcebook: Ch 9 - whole chapter, all cases; Ch 15.2b:Secretary, Department of Social Security v James
• Conveyancing Act 1919(NSW), s12 and s23C

Criteria

Marking Rubric Unsatisfactory Minimal Effective Excellent Outstanding Criteria [fail) (pass) (credit) (distinction) (high distinction) 0-49% SOX-64% 65%-74% 75%-84% 85%%-100%% Characterisation Very poor of facts characterisation with Basic Effective Accurate and Accurate, substantial errors characterisation. characterisation. Few clear thorough, and and/or omissions Some errors key errors or characterisation. clear and/or omissions. Minoro key characterisation. omissions errors or No or only omissions Insignificant, errors Identification of Poor identification of | Basic Effective Thorough Comprehensive relevant law relevant low. identification of Identification of Identification of identification of Substantial errors relevant law. relevant law. Some relevant relevant and/or omissions Errors and/or errors or omissions. law. Minoro law. No or only omissions errors or Insignificant, omissions errors. Application of No, pooror Basic Effective application Excellent Outstanding law and legal inaccurate application of of law and legal application of application of reasoning application of law law and legal reasoning law and legal law and legal and legal reasoning reasoning reasoning reasoning Communication: Poor/unclear Basic writing Effective, clear Excellent, dear, Outstanding writing and writing, incorrect and/or basic writing, and effective and professional clear, structure use of words, and/or structure structure writing and professional Illogical, unclear logical, effective writing and structure structure logical, effective structure