Answer the questions based on this week's reading and videos.

1. According to the video, besides Red Lobster what other restaurants are an option for the Professor on Wednesdays? (Include video time-stamp, minutes:seconds, where you heard the answer.)
2. According to the video, what is the name of the scientific evidence that supports the free-will argument? (Include videotime-stamp, minutes:seconds, where you heard the answer.)
3. Based on the reading, how does D'Holbach interpret the process of deliberation? (Include page number where you found your answer.) Is he right or wrong and why?
4. If humans are not free, why do we hold them guilty for wrong action?
5. According to the video, what example does the professor give about finding a culture with 'sufficient isolation' while working in his office a few years ago? Include time-stamp (minute:second).
6. Is Benedict correct in saying that our culture is "but one entry in a long series of possible adjustments"? Why or why not?
7. How does Rachels' critique of the 'cultural difference argument' speak to Benedict's essay?
8. How would you account for judging some cultural ethics to be wrong/right? Any examples?
9. What would you do with Gyges' ring?

Now, the big ones

1. In terms of percentage, how free on average is a human being and why? (Don't answer politically, but instead how free are humans in their capability to make choices and act on those choices.)
2. What are some moral absolutes that are always right and always wrong? List at least two for each onepositive and negative and why.

text:

Philosophy: The Quest for Truth, 11^thEdition by Louis P. Pojman and Lewis Vaughn