Arizona's probation system is mostly run by the state, but some services are leased out to private companies. Privatization in probation can be helpful because it can save money and make things run more smoothly by bringing in new ideas and competition. There are, however, some problems with this approach as well. For example, people who are only interested in making money could lower the level of services and oversight, which could make people more likely to commit crimes again. Because privatization has two sides, it needs to be carefully thought out and regulated to make sure that private companies meet high standards of service. Arizona's probation system is having trouble meeting the needs of its partners, such as probationers, victims, and the community. Evidence-based methods have been tried to be used, but the system has trouble with not having enough resources and program quality that isn't always the same. To make Arizona's probation system work better, I would suggest giving probation officers more money to make sure they get the training and help they need. Comprehensive data analytics could also help with making decisions, letting for more personalized interventions that meet the needs of each person, which would lead