As discussed by your readings and learning materials for this unit, many observers, sometimes dubbed 'hyperglobalizers,' interpret our current era of globalization as one characterized by 'global governance.' According to this view, state sovereignty has been largely eclipsed by the collective power of intergovernmental organizations like the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), international economic institutions like the World Bank and the IMF, transnational corporations like Walmart and Shell, and non-governmental organizations like Amnesty International and Greenpeace.

This discussion invites you to consider the validity of this interpretation of political globalization, by reflecting on the current Ukraine crisis, and considering what the global response to this crisis tells us about the relative power of individual states, and the role of intergovernmental organizations like the United Nations, NATO, and the European Union. To what extent are we currently living in an era of global governance? To what extent do individual states retain sovereignty? Are all states equally independent? Would a 'real' world government be preferable in the face of this kind of global crisis? Why or why not?

Your original post should consist of, at minimum, 8 - 10 long, elaborate, and thought-provoking sentences.