As the hiring coordinator for ABC Networking Solutions, Inc. $($Hennessey$),$ Jan Marcus knew that her position was of utmost importance to her company in terms of hiring candidates who were well qualified and who would best contribute to the company's overall success. On her desk was the employment application and resume of John Michaels. Jan Marcus had just finished her interview with John Michaels, who was the last in a long line of interviewees who had applied for an entry$-$level information technology $($IT$)$ position at ABC. ABC only had one opening available.

During John Michael's interview, the candidate revealed that seven years ago, he had been tried and convicted in federal court for selling a significant amount of cocaine. John Michael had also revealed the conviction on his employment application. John Michael went to great lengths to explain to Jan Marcus that he sincerely regretted the indiscretions of his youth and that he had spent the last seven years of his life paying penance and reforming his life. After serving three years in federal penitentiary, John Michael had earned his bachelor's degree in Information Technology, graduating with honors. John Michael's interview had gone very well. In fact, Jan Marcus felt that in terms of his personality and education, he was the best fit for the position. Jan Marcus was obviously concerned about John Michael's criminal background, but she was also concerned about the young man should he not find an employment opportunity after graduating from college. Without a legitimate employment option, would John Michael revert back to his criminal ways?

State fully the ethical dilemma that Jan Marcus faces in this situation. This should include all factors that Jan Marcus is weighing.

Define and Apply at least three ethical frameworks to this business problem and Develop a decision based on each framework.

Describe all of the possible consequences for each of the decisions made in question $2.$