ask a good question based in the following context: $"$In software development, prioritizing "Working Software over Comprehensive Documentation" as per the Agile Manifesto can sometimes lead to significant issues. For example, consider a team developing an enterprise resource planning $($ERP$)$ system for a large corporation. Stakeholders expect detailed documentation at every stage, including user manuals and test plans. However, if the development team focuses solely on delivering working software without adequate documentation, end$-$users may struggle with adoption due to lack of instructions. This can lead to increased support requests and poor satisfaction rates.

Without comprehensive test plans, critical testing scenarios might be overlooked, potentially leading to undetected bugs that compromise the final product's quality. Future maintenance teams may also face challenges understanding the system architecture and codebase without detailed documentation, making it difficult to fix issues or implement new features efficiently. Furthermore, some industries require extensive documentation for compliance purposes; failing to meet these requirements could result in legal consequences or penalties.

Scrum methodology provides a structured approach that addresses many of the risks associated with insufficient documentation while adhering to Agile principles. During Sprint Planning meetings, the team discusses what can be delivered during a sprint, including necessary documentation items like test plans or basic design documents. Additionally, each user story in the Product Backlog includes acceptance criteria serving as lightweight documentation for clarity among developers and stakeholders.

Scrum's Definition of Done $($DoD$)$ often includes certain levels of required documentation, ensuring that critical aspects are not overlooked while still prioritizing working software. Regular feedback loops during Sprint Review meetings allow stakeholders to provide input on whether additional documentation is needed based on their interaction with the delivered increments. This ensures continuous alignment of expectations without sacrificing progress. Moreover, regular retrospectives help the team reflect and adjust practices, maintaining a balance between delivering functional software and providing necessary documentation for effective project execution."