Assessment Two: Meta Reflection 20 Marks For your final submission you are required to write a meta-reflection. Writing your meta-reflection will entail going back over all the reflections you have written and 'reflecting on those reflections'. This will require a deeper level of reflection and analysis to assist you to understand the process and to write an honest appraisal of your learning. You are required to include at least two academic sources to support your writing. Meta reflection Well developed [5 marks] Partially developed [3-4 Needs further development Learning outcome Comments marky] Comments [0-2 marks] Comments Meta Reflection : shows evidence of student's self-evaluation of their learning from descriptive to analytical levels of reflection. (2.5) Critical thinking and the appropriation of academic theories and sources have been used. (2.5) Meta Reflection : shows evidence of response to feedback. (2.5) Feedback has been used as a means for further reflection and change. (2.5) Meta Reflection : shows evidence of connecting and integrating learning to give meaning to their experience. () Use of referencing Well developed Partially developed Needs further development [1.5-2.5 mark:]Comments [1-2 marks] Comments [0-1 mark] Comments Reflections: Harvard Referencing Correct use of in- text references have been applied to reflections(2.5) Meta Reflection : Harvard Referencing A complete and accurate reference list has been created. (2.5)