Assume that at this point P&G has two options - they could either do nothing

(their current stance) or they could reformulate Tide Pods to assure that they are as safe as other

laundry detergent products. Also assume that neither option would break the law, and that

reformulation will mean both expense and loss of market share for P&G.

Please answer the following questions:

1. Which option would a utilitarian say that P&G should pick?

2. Which option would an egoist say that P&G should pick?

3. Which option would a Kantian say that P&G should pick?

4. Which option would you chose and why (it does not have to be 1, 2, or 3)?

Please divide your response into three sections corresponding to the three questions above.