Assume that you are a high level manager for a shoe manufacturer. You know you could increase you profit margin by hiring women in Indonesia that you pay $100 a month; however, you also know that some believe this is an exploitative labor practice. Using an outcome-based or utilitarianism approach to ethics, which of the following is true? The exploitation of women is never ethical, therefore, you would not hire the women in Indonesia. In this case exploitation consists of paying $100/month - a fraction of the U.S. minimum wage. 2) You look to see what would happen if everyone acted this same way - what is the categorical imperative? If everyone moved jobs overseas to hire lower paid workers what would happen? What happens if everyone constantly chases lower wages? 3) You make the decision based on your own religious based ethical standard. 4) You would weigh some of the negatives of hiring the women in Indonesia (may be exploitive, could hurt your workers in the U.S., could give you negative press) against the positives (you may be able to help the women improve their lives, you will delive more profit to shareholders) and make your decision based on sound ethical reasoning that can be supported.