Response Questions Part A To B Your Response For Part A To B MUST use the following "FORMAT": FACTS- ISSUE(S)- (What is the dispute between the parties? What is question to be discussed?) LAW-(What is the applicable law?) Research the law in the chapter, cite and define/explain which laws are applicable. DISCUSSION- (This is your analysis-include major and minor points and opposing points of view or counterpoints to add depth to your analysis. Remember, use proper paragraphs should be at least 2/3 paragraphs.) CONCLUSION-(Sometimes referred to as the Resolution-I should be able to know your conclusion by the way your framed your issue and by your Discussion-go back to your Issue- see if you answered the question(s) posed in a sentence or two at best.) Part A: Jason Trevor owns a commercial bakery in Blakely, Georgia, that produces a variety of goods sold in gro- cery stores. Trevor is required by law to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination. On three occasions, tests of food products containing peanut but ter were positive for salmonella contamination. Trevor was not required to report the results to U.S. Food and Drug Administra- tion officials, however, so he did not. Instead, Trevor instructed his employees to simply repeat the tests until the results were negative. Meanwhile, the products that had originally tested positive for salmonella were eventually shipped out to retail- ers. Five people who ate Trevor's baked goods that year became seriously ill, and one person died from a salmonella infection. Even though Trevor's conduct was legal, was it unethical for him to sell goods that had once tested positive for salmonella? Why or why not? Part B: Assume that you are a high-level manager for a shoe manufacturer. You know that your firm could increase its profit margin by producing shoes in Indonesia, where you could hire women for $100 a month to assemble them. You also know that human rights advocates recently accused a competing shoe manufacturer of engaging in exploitative labor practices because the manufacturer sold shoes made by Indonesian women for similarly low wages. You personally do not believe that paying $100 a month to Indone. sian women is unethical because you know that in their coun- try, $100 a month is a better-than-average wage rate. Write one page explaining whether you would have the shoes manufac- tured in Indonesia and make higher profits for the company or avoid the risk of negative publicity and its potential adverse consequences for the firm's reputation. Are there other alter natives? Discuss fully