Assume the assumptions of Arbitrage Pricing Theory hold and a three-factor model describes the realized returns....
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Assume the assumptions of Arbitrage Pricing Theory hold and a three-factor model describes the realized returns. All other risk is diversifiable. Assume that factors are normalized so that E[₁] = E[F₂] = E[F3] The risk-free rate is rf = 2% = 0.02 and you are given the multi-factor representation of three risky assets: TA = 0.05 + F₁ + EA TB = 0.02 — F₁ + F₂ + EB - rc = 0.085 – 0.5 · Ẽ₁ + Ẽ₂ + F3 + ẵc where risks EA, EB, EC are diversifiable/idiosyncratic. a) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What are the risk-premia for holding factors 1,2,3? b) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What is the expected return of an asset that has loading 0.75 on factor 1, 0.2 on factor 2, and -0.4 on factor 3? c) Suppose there is an asset with loadings of 1 on each of the factors. The asset has an expected return of 10%. If there arbitrage? If so, construct the arbitrage strategy. Assume the assumptions of Arbitrage Pricing Theory hold and a three-factor model describes the realized returns. All other risk is diversifiable. Assume that factors are normalized so that E[₁] = E[F₂] = E[F3] The risk-free rate is rf = 2% = 0.02 and you are given the multi-factor representation of three risky assets: TA = 0.05 + F₁ + EA TB = 0.02 — F₁ + F₂ + EB - rc = 0.085 – 0.5 · Ẽ₁ + Ẽ₂ + F3 + ẵc where risks EA, EB, EC are diversifiable/idiosyncratic. a) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What are the risk-premia for holding factors 1,2,3? b) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What is the expected return of an asset that has loading 0.75 on factor 1, 0.2 on factor 2, and -0.4 on factor 3? c) Suppose there is an asset with loadings of 1 on each of the factors. The asset has an expected return of 10%. If there arbitrage? If so, construct the arbitrage strategy. Assume the assumptions of Arbitrage Pricing Theory hold and a three-factor model describes the realized returns. All other risk is diversifiable. Assume that factors are normalized so that E[₁] = E[F₂] = E[F3] The risk-free rate is rf = 2% = 0.02 and you are given the multi-factor representation of three risky assets: TA = 0.05 + F₁ + EA TB = 0.02 — F₁ + F₂ + EB - rc = 0.085 – 0.5 · Ẽ₁ + Ẽ₂ + F3 + ẵc where risks EA, EB, EC are diversifiable/idiosyncratic. a) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What are the risk-premia for holding factors 1,2,3? b) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What is the expected return of an asset that has loading 0.75 on factor 1, 0.2 on factor 2, and -0.4 on factor 3? c) Suppose there is an asset with loadings of 1 on each of the factors. The asset has an expected return of 10%. If there arbitrage? If so, construct the arbitrage strategy. Assume the assumptions of Arbitrage Pricing Theory hold and a three-factor model describes the realized returns. All other risk is diversifiable. Assume that factors are normalized so that E[₁] = E[F₂] = E[F3] The risk-free rate is rf = 2% = 0.02 and you are given the multi-factor representation of three risky assets: TA = 0.05 + F₁ + EA TB = 0.02 — F₁ + F₂ + EB - rc = 0.085 – 0.5 · Ẽ₁ + Ẽ₂ + F3 + ẵc where risks EA, EB, EC are diversifiable/idiosyncratic. a) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What are the risk-premia for holding factors 1,2,3? b) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What is the expected return of an asset that has loading 0.75 on factor 1, 0.2 on factor 2, and -0.4 on factor 3? c) Suppose there is an asset with loadings of 1 on each of the factors. The asset has an expected return of 10%. If there arbitrage? If so, construct the arbitrage strategy. Assume the assumptions of Arbitrage Pricing Theory hold and a three-factor model describes the realized returns. All other risk is diversifiable. Assume that factors are normalized so that E[₁] = E[F₂] = E[F3] The risk-free rate is rf = 2% = 0.02 and you are given the multi-factor representation of three risky assets: TA = 0.05 + F₁ + EA TB = 0.02 — F₁ + F₂ + EB - rc = 0.085 – 0.5 · Ẽ₁ + Ẽ₂ + F3 + ẵc where risks EA, EB, EC are diversifiable/idiosyncratic. a) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What are the risk-premia for holding factors 1,2,3? b) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What is the expected return of an asset that has loading 0.75 on factor 1, 0.2 on factor 2, and -0.4 on factor 3? c) Suppose there is an asset with loadings of 1 on each of the factors. The asset has an expected return of 10%. If there arbitrage? If so, construct the arbitrage strategy. Assume the assumptions of Arbitrage Pricing Theory hold and a three-factor model describes the realized returns. All other risk is diversifiable. Assume that factors are normalized so that E[₁] = E[F₂] = E[F3] The risk-free rate is rf = 2% = 0.02 and you are given the multi-factor representation of three risky assets: TA = 0.05 + F₁ + EA TB = 0.02 — F₁ + F₂ + EB - rc = 0.085 – 0.5 · Ẽ₁ + Ẽ₂ + F3 + ẵc where risks EA, EB, EC are diversifiable/idiosyncratic. a) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What are the risk-premia for holding factors 1,2,3? b) Assume the 3-factor Arbitrage Pricing Theory applies. What is the expected return of an asset that has loading 0.75 on factor 1, 0.2 on factor 2, and -0.4 on factor 3? c) Suppose there is an asset with loadings of 1 on each of the factors. The asset has an expected return of 10%. If there arbitrage? If so, construct the arbitrage strategy.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
a Ass ume the 3 factor Arbit rage Pricing Theory applies What are the risk prem ia for holding factors 1 2 3 ANS WER The risk prem ia for holding fact... View the full answer
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
The feature of arbitrage pricing theory (APT) that offers the greatest potential advantage over the simple CAPM is the: a. Identification of anticipated changes in production, inflation, and term...
-
You are using the arbitrage pricing model to estimate the expected return on Bethlehem Steel and have derived the following estimates for the factor betas and risk premia: a. Which risk factor is...
-
The arbitrage pricing theory (APT) differs from the single-factor capital asset pricing model (CAPM) because the APT: a. Places more emphasis on market risk. b. Minimizes the importance of...
-
Both high-income and low-income employees are covered by cafeteria plans. Under such plans, all employees may select from a list of non-taxable fringe benefits or they may elect to receive cash in...
-
Why is the brand attitude model important for brand positioning strategy?
-
Vernon Manufacturing paid $58,000 to purchase a computerized assembly machine on January 1, 2012. The machine had an estimated life of eight years and a $2,000 salvage value . Vernon's financial...
-
A senior VP has proposed that "we pay too much tax, so we should issue new debt and use the proceeds to buy back common stock." What would be the logic behind this statement?
-
Calculate the following ratios for Lake of Egypt Marina, Inc. as of year-end 2018? Use the following financial statements for Lake of Egypt Marina, Inc. Calculate the following ratios for Lake of...
-
Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon, or Bacon's Law, is a game that became popular, stating that if you choose any actor and then connect them to another actor in a film they share, you can do this and find a...
-
Values for the NASDAQ composite index during the 1,500 days preceding March 10, 2006, can be downloaded from the authors web site. Calculate the one-day 99% VaR and the one-day 99% ES on March 10,...
-
Consider a hanging spring of negligible mass that does not obey Hooke's law. When the spring is extended by a distance x, the force exerted by the spring has magnitude 2x, where is a constant. The...
-
Research a recent communication evaluation case study. Highlight research questions and parameters the case study may feature to assess impact on key social determinants of health and among...
-
Discuss the significance, pros and cons, and implications of current trends and core principles in the evaluation of health communication programs as described in this chapter (for example,...
-
Using again the fictional example of Luciana, the nineteen-year-old Italian woman who spends a lot of time at the beach and is unaware of the risk for skin cancer (see Box 2. 1), list and discuss...
-
Identify a local community organization in your city or neighborhood. Contact the organization to learn in advance about any upcoming health communication intervention it may be planning, and whether...
-
Identify, research, and discuss examples of key social and political factors (as they relate to the environment in which people live and work) that contribute to a health issue of your choice or to...
-
What is the specific of Amazon Go in retail marketing? Explain.
-
Determine the center and radius of each circle. Sketch each circle. 4x 2 + 4y 2 9 = 16y
-
Bill Smith is evaluating the performance of four large-cap equity portfolios: Funds A, B, C, and D. As part of his analysis, Smith computed the Sharpe ratio and the Treynor measure for all four...
-
Suppose the 1-year futures price on a stock-index portfolio is 1,218, the stock index currently is 1,200, the 1-year risk-free interest rate is 3%, and the year-end dividend that will be paid on a...
-
Suppose that the value of the S&P 500 stock index is 1,150. a. If each futures contract costs $25 to trade with a discount broker, how much is the transaction cost per dollar of stock controlled by...
-
Using an economic balance sheet, which of the Laws current financial assets is most concerning from an asset allocation perspective? A. Equities B. Real estate C. Fixed income Raye uses a costbenefit...
-
Using the economic balance sheet approach, the Laws economic net worth is closest to: A. $925,000. B. $1,425,000. C. $1,675,000. Raye uses a costbenefit approach to rebalancing and recommends that...
-
Raye believes the previous advisers asset class specifications for equity and derivatives are inappropriate given that, for purposes of asset allocation, asset classes should be: A. diversifying. B....
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App