attachment 2

Overview This case study is based on the attached process, which we have been speaking about in class. This report must demonstrate the inefficiencies that exist within thecurrent output. The goal of this case is to apply improvement techniques (STEP 6) that will have a significant impact in terms of cost, productivity and value added outputs. The report must identify alternatives to mitigate gaps that have been identified that will result in increased efficiencies to the organization. Report Guidelines Format - include a cover letter, title page, executive summary, and table of contents. Students must submit using Microsoft word using Arial font, size 12 and double-space their report. Executive Summary (250 - 500 words) - briefly outline the performance gap, why youbelieve there is an opportunity (impact to business) to increase efficiencies, and identify the proposed solution. This section of the report should also include a clearlydefined linkage between business process management and organizational efficiencies. Original Cost Calculation - determine the baseline cost of the current process using the information provided in attachment #1. Process Analyses - alternative options you have considered (500 words) - demonstrate you have fully considered all possible alternatives and the pros/cons ofeach. Preferred Option (250 words) - indicate why you feel the new process you are recommending will result in efficiencies within the organization. The recommendation must be clearly presented with a direct link to the ultimate goal ofbusiness process management, which is efficiency. Calculate at least one employee cost for this process - This must include all 4 stepsto calculating employee cost covered in STEP 5. The details are included in attachment #1 New Process Map - include a reengineered process map that shows the newrecommended option based on your analysis. The report must be organized in a clear and consistent manner with a logical flow.Referencing all sources need to be referenced using APA referencing guidelines. Attachment #1 This covers every employee at this company: The organization performs the process 200 times a year. Each employee is available to work 2080hrs based on a 40/hr workweek but receives the following: 3 weeks' vacation 1 week sick time 10 paid holidays Salary = $45,000 Effective Benefit Rate = 35% Process time can be found on the flow chart. Total tool cost is $500 before total tool cost dedicated to business process. 5 minutes 2 hours Recommend Employee for an Award cycle time Send Authorization to Payroll 20 minutes 5-10 minutes sdays 20-30 minutes Adays Yes Compensation Analyst 1 Complete Recognition Bonus Award Form & Mail to Next Level Manager Completed Fom 2 Approve or Reject Request Approval Review Eligibility, Justification & Award Amount Approved Justit & Amount OK to Proceed Parol Notification sminutes Ne 1 hour Manager Manger 2 Interoffice Compensation Analyst This step may involve calling the manager to discuss the justification and or explaining the policy Notily Requesting Manager Rejection Compensuon Analyst E+ END Daniel Request Rital Approval minutes Iday Communicate Award to Employee Award Communicated Manager Final Approval ENO 10.12 minutos I day Updated Update Employee System of Record (SOR) & Retain Hardcopy Compensation Analyst SOR Review the grading rubric for this case This assignment will be graded out of 60 based on the rubric below. Exemplar Accomplishe Developin Incomplet 7110 d[7 points) 8/3 point) e point) points) Response Response Response The link Executive Summary demonstrates demonstrates demonstrat between a an es improvement thorough and in understanding of some techniques and depth the relationship understanding of business process understanding of between the relationship management is not the relationship improvement between discussed between techniques and improvement improvement business process techniques and techniques and management business process business process management management Process Analyses Preferred Option Response Response Response Process analyses demonstrates demonstrates demonstrat isnot discussed a an es thorough and in understanding of some depth process analyses understanding of understanding of process analyses process analyses Response Response Response An alternate demonstrates demonstrates demonstrat athorough option was not an essome and in understanding recommended of depth how to evaluate understanding of understanding of business process, how to evaluate how to evaluate business process business process Recommendatio n Calculating Process Cost Response demonstrates athorough and in depth understanding of Response demonstrates an understanding ofprocess cost Response demonstrat esome Process cost was not included understanding of process cost process cost. New Process Map Process map wasnot included. Response Response Response demonstrates a demonstrates demonstrates thorough and in an some depth understanding understanding understanding of ofprocess ofprocess process redesign redesignand redesignand and the the importance the importance importanceof of of improvement improvement improvement techniques. techniques techniques Report Format Report was notproperly formatted Response Response demonstrates a demonstrates thorough and in an depth understanding understanding of ofwriting a the importance clear and of writing a clear concise report andconcise with a logical report with flow. a logical flow. Response demonstrates some understanding ofwriting a clear and concise report with a logical flow. Overview This case study is based on the attached process, which we have been speaking about in class. This report must demonstrate the inefficiencies that exist within thecurrent output. The goal of this case is to apply improvement techniques (STEP 6) that will have a significant impact in terms of cost, productivity and value added outputs. The report must identify alternatives to mitigate gaps that have been identified that will result in increased efficiencies to the organization. Report Guidelines Format - include a cover letter, title page, executive summary, and table of contents. Students must submit using Microsoft word using Arial font, size 12 and double-space their report. Executive Summary (250 - 500 words) - briefly outline the performance gap, why youbelieve there is an opportunity (impact to business) to increase efficiencies, and identify the proposed solution. This section of the report should also include a clearlydefined linkage between business process management and organizational efficiencies. Original Cost Calculation - determine the baseline cost of the current process using the information provided in attachment #1. Process Analyses - alternative options you have considered (500 words) - demonstrate you have fully considered all possible alternatives and the pros/cons ofeach. Preferred Option (250 words) - indicate why you feel the new process you are recommending will result in efficiencies within the organization. The recommendation must be clearly presented with a direct link to the ultimate goal ofbusiness process management, which is efficiency. Calculate at least one employee cost for this process - This must include all 4 stepsto calculating employee cost covered in STEP 5. The details are included in attachment #1 New Process Map - include a reengineered process map that shows the newrecommended option based on your analysis. The report must be organized in a clear and consistent manner with a logical flow.Referencing all sources need to be referenced using APA referencing guidelines. Attachment #1 This covers every employee at this company: The organization performs the process 200 times a year. Each employee is available to work 2080hrs based on a 40/hr workweek but receives the following: 3 weeks' vacation 1 week sick time 10 paid holidays Salary = $45,000 Effective Benefit Rate = 35% Process time can be found on the flow chart. Total tool cost is $500 before total tool cost dedicated to business process. 5 minutes 2 hours Recommend Employee for an Award cycle time Send Authorization to Payroll 20 minutes 5-10 minutes sdays 20-30 minutes Adays Yes Compensation Analyst 1 Complete Recognition Bonus Award Form & Mail to Next Level Manager Completed Fom 2 Approve or Reject Request Approval Review Eligibility, Justification & Award Amount Approved Justit & Amount OK to Proceed Parol Notification sminutes Ne 1 hour Manager Manger 2 Interoffice Compensation Analyst This step may involve calling the manager to discuss the justification and or explaining the policy Notily Requesting Manager Rejection Compensuon Analyst E+ END Daniel Request Rital Approval minutes Iday Communicate Award to Employee Award Communicated Manager Final Approval ENO 10.12 minutos I day Updated Update Employee System of Record (SOR) & Retain Hardcopy Compensation Analyst SOR Review the grading rubric for this case This assignment will be graded out of 60 based on the rubric below. Exemplar Accomplishe Developin Incomplet 7110 d[7 points) 8/3 point) e point) points) Response Response Response The link Executive Summary demonstrates demonstrates demonstrat between a an es improvement thorough and in understanding of some techniques and depth the relationship understanding of business process understanding of between the relationship management is not the relationship improvement between discussed between techniques and improvement improvement business process techniques and techniques and management business process business process management management Process Analyses Preferred Option Response Response Response Process analyses demonstrates demonstrates demonstrat isnot discussed a an es thorough and in understanding of some depth process analyses understanding of understanding of process analyses process analyses Response Response Response An alternate demonstrates demonstrates demonstrat athorough option was not an essome and in understanding recommended of depth how to evaluate understanding of understanding of business process, how to evaluate how to evaluate business process business process Recommendatio n Calculating Process Cost Response demonstrates athorough and in depth understanding of Response demonstrates an understanding ofprocess cost Response demonstrat esome Process cost was not included understanding of process cost process cost. New Process Map Process map wasnot included. Response Response Response demonstrates a demonstrates demonstrates thorough and in an some depth understanding understanding understanding of ofprocess ofprocess process redesign redesignand redesignand and the the importance the importance importanceof of of improvement improvement improvement techniques. techniques techniques Report Format Report was notproperly formatted Response Response demonstrates a demonstrates thorough and in an depth understanding understanding of ofwriting a the importance clear and of writing a clear concise report andconcise with a logical report with flow. a logical flow. Response demonstrates some understanding ofwriting a clear and concise report with a logical flow