Question: Austin's Command Theory does not include holding the sovereign (think of this as our three branches of government) accountable to the law the way that
Austin\'s Command Theory does not include holding the sovereign (think of this as our three branches of government) accountable to the law the way that citizens are responsible for following the law. In contrast, Hart\\\'s inclusion of the Secondary Rules in the contemporary version of legal positivism does account for holding the sovereign to the rule of law. Which of these two theories do you think is the best approach for legal positivism? Explain your reasoning.
Step by Step Solution
3.43 Rating (153 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Austins command theory believes in implementing the law as a set of rules and compel the citizen to ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
