Wilcox, U.S. gulf coast Sparta, south Louisiana (Opelousas) Cockfield, south Louisiana Government wells, south Texas Frio,...

Transcribed Image Text:

Wilcox, U.S. gulf coast Sparta, south Louisiana (Opelousas) Cockfield, south Louisiana Government wells, south Texas Frio, south Texas Miocene, south Texas Travis Peak and Cotton Valley, TX Rodessa, east Texas Edwards, south Texas Woodbine, east Texas Annona, north Louisiana Nacatoch, Arkansas Eilenburger, west Texas Ordovician Simpson, west Texas and New Mexico Pennsylvania, west Texas Permian, west Texas Simpson, Kansas Pennsylvanian, Oklahoma Bartlesville, Kansas Mississippian, Illinois Mississippian, Illinois Pennsylvanian, Illinois Madison, North Dakota Muddy, Nebraska Cretaceous, Saskatchewan, Canada Bradford, Pennsylvania Frio, Chocolate Bayou, Louisiana Frio, Agua Dulce, south Texas Frio, Edinburgh, south Texas Frio, Hollow Tree, south Texas Jackson, Cole Sand, south Texas Navarro, Olmos, Delmonte, south Texas Edwards Lime, Darst Creek County, Texas Viola, Bowie field, north Texas Lakota Sd., Crook County, Wyoming Lithology SS SS SS SS SS Cons. SS Uncons. SS SS LS LS SS Chalk SS LS and Dol. SS LS SS SS SS SS LS SS SS LS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS LS LS SS Average Average m n 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.95 1.6 1.8 2.0 200000 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.6 ITINE 1.9 • ∞07∞∞∞ar 1.8 1.75 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.6 2.0 1.55 to 1.94 1.71 1.82 1.80 1.87 2.01 1.89 1.94 2.02 1.77 1.52 1.8 1.6 2.1 6698- 112 1.9 1.8 2.1 17680⁰ in 2.1 ۔نہ نہ 1.7 1.6 2.8 2.5 1.5 1.3 3.8 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.3 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.73 to 2.22 1.66 1.47 1.52 1.64 1.69 1.66 1.49 2.04 2.08 1.15 1.28 SS=sandstone; LS=limestone; Dol.-dolomite; Cons. =consolidated; Uncons. -unconsolidated. a. Do these data support an assumption of m=n? Explain. b. If we have to assume m=n, will this assumption be better for sandstones or limestones? Explain. Wilcox, U.S. gulf coast Sparta, south Louisiana (Opelousas) Cockfield, south Louisiana Government wells, south Texas Frio, south Texas Miocene, south Texas Travis Peak and Cotton Valley, TX Rodessa, east Texas Edwards, south Texas Woodbine, east Texas Annona, north Louisiana Nacatoch, Arkansas Eilenburger, west Texas Ordovician Simpson, west Texas and New Mexico Pennsylvania, west Texas Permian, west Texas Simpson, Kansas Pennsylvanian, Oklahoma Bartlesville, Kansas Mississippian, Illinois Mississippian, Illinois Pennsylvanian, Illinois Madison, North Dakota Muddy, Nebraska Cretaceous, Saskatchewan, Canada Bradford, Pennsylvania Frio, Chocolate Bayou, Louisiana Frio, Agua Dulce, south Texas Frio, Edinburgh, south Texas Frio, Hollow Tree, south Texas Jackson, Cole Sand, south Texas Navarro, Olmos, Delmonte, south Texas Edwards Lime, Darst Creek County, Texas Viola, Bowie field, north Texas Lakota Sd., Crook County, Wyoming Lithology SS SS SS SS SS Cons. SS Uncons. SS SS LS LS SS Chalk SS LS and Dol. SS LS SS SS SS SS LS SS SS LS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS LS LS SS Average Average m n 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.95 1.6 1.8 2.0 200000 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.6 ITINE 1.9 • ∞07∞∞∞ar 1.8 1.75 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.6 2.0 1.55 to 1.94 1.71 1.82 1.80 1.87 2.01 1.89 1.94 2.02 1.77 1.52 1.8 1.6 2.1 6698- 112 1.9 1.8 2.1 17680 in 2.1 ۔نہ نہ 1.7 1.6 2.8 2.5 1.5 1.3 3.8 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.3 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.73 to 2.22 1.66 1.47 1.52 1.64 1.69 1.66 1.49 2.04 2.08 1.15 1.28 SS=sandstone; LS=limestone; Dol.-dolomite; Cons. =consolidated; Uncons. unconsolidated. a. Do these data support an assumption of m=n? Explain. b. If we have to assume m=n, will this assumption be better for sandstones or limestones? Explain. Wilcox, U.S. gulf coast Sparta, south Louisiana (Opelousas) Cockfield, south Louisiana Government wells, south Texas Frio, south Texas Miocene, south Texas Travis Peak and Cotton Valley, TX Rodessa, east Texas Edwards, south Texas Woodbine, east Texas Annona, north Louisiana Nacatoch, Arkansas Eilenburger, west Texas Ordovician Simpson, west Texas and New Mexico Pennsylvania, west Texas Permian, west Texas Simpson, Kansas Pennsylvanian, Oklahoma Bartlesville, Kansas Mississippian, Illinois Mississippian, Illinois Pennsylvanian, Illinois Madison, North Dakota Muddy, Nebraska Cretaceous, Saskatchewan, Canada Bradford, Pennsylvania Frio, Chocolate Bayou, Louisiana Frio, Agua Dulce, south Texas Frio, Edinburgh, south Texas Frio, Hollow Tree, south Texas Jackson, Cole Sand, south Texas Navarro, Olmos, Delmonte, south Texas Edwards Lime, Darst Creek County, Texas Viola, Bowie field, north Texas Lakota Sd., Crook County, Wyoming Lithology SS SS SS SS SS Cons. SS Uncons. SS SS LS LS SS Chalk SS LS and Dol. SS LS SS SS SS SS LS SS SS LS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS LS LS SS Average Average m n 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.95 1.6 1.8 2.0 200000 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.6 ITINE 1.9 • ∞07∞∞∞ar 1.8 1.75 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.6 2.0 1.55 to 1.94 1.71 1.82 1.80 1.87 2.01 1.89 1.94 2.02 1.77 1.52 1.8 1.6 2.1 6698- 112 1.9 1.8 2.1 17680⁰ in 2.1 ۔نہ نہ 1.7 1.6 2.8 2.5 1.5 1.3 3.8 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.3 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.73 to 2.22 1.66 1.47 1.52 1.64 1.69 1.66 1.49 2.04 2.08 1.15 1.28 SS=sandstone; LS=limestone; Dol.-dolomite; Cons. =consolidated; Uncons. -unconsolidated. a. Do these data support an assumption of m=n? Explain. b. If we have to assume m=n, will this assumption be better for sandstones or limestones? Explain. Wilcox, U.S. gulf coast Sparta, south Louisiana (Opelousas) Cockfield, south Louisiana Government wells, south Texas Frio, south Texas Miocene, south Texas Travis Peak and Cotton Valley, TX Rodessa, east Texas Edwards, south Texas Woodbine, east Texas Annona, north Louisiana Nacatoch, Arkansas Eilenburger, west Texas Ordovician Simpson, west Texas and New Mexico Pennsylvania, west Texas Permian, west Texas Simpson, Kansas Pennsylvanian, Oklahoma Bartlesville, Kansas Mississippian, Illinois Mississippian, Illinois Pennsylvanian, Illinois Madison, North Dakota Muddy, Nebraska Cretaceous, Saskatchewan, Canada Bradford, Pennsylvania Frio, Chocolate Bayou, Louisiana Frio, Agua Dulce, south Texas Frio, Edinburgh, south Texas Frio, Hollow Tree, south Texas Jackson, Cole Sand, south Texas Navarro, Olmos, Delmonte, south Texas Edwards Lime, Darst Creek County, Texas Viola, Bowie field, north Texas Lakota Sd., Crook County, Wyoming Lithology SS SS SS SS SS Cons. SS Uncons. SS SS LS LS SS Chalk SS LS and Dol. SS LS SS SS SS SS LS SS SS LS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS LS LS SS Average Average m n 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.95 1.6 1.8 2.0 200000 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.6 ITINE 1.9 • ∞07∞∞∞ar 1.8 1.75 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.6 2.0 1.55 to 1.94 1.71 1.82 1.80 1.87 2.01 1.89 1.94 2.02 1.77 1.52 1.8 1.6 2.1 6698- 112 1.9 1.8 2.1 17680 in 2.1 ۔نہ نہ 1.7 1.6 2.8 2.5 1.5 1.3 3.8 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.3 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.73 to 2.22 1.66 1.47 1.52 1.64 1.69 1.66 1.49 2.04 2.08 1.15 1.28 SS=sandstone; LS=limestone; Dol.-dolomite; Cons. =consolidated; Uncons. unconsolidated. a. Do these data support an assumption of m=n? Explain. b. If we have to assume m=n, will this assumption be better for sandstones or limestones? Explain.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

a To test if mn we can calculate the ratio of sandstone SS values to limestone LS valu... View the full answer