base on the case stste who the plainfif was and what was their action

The Valverde v$.$ Xclusive Staffing, Inc., et al case involved an employment dispute between a temporary employee, Maria Valverde, and her staffing agency, Xclusive Staffing, Inc. Valverde alleged sexual harassment and discrimination by her supervisor at the Santa Anita Park racetrack in California. Despite reporting the incidents to Xclusive Staffing, Inc., no action was taken. Valverde filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of $1964,$ but Xclusive Staffing, Inc. moved to dismiss the case citing the statute of limitations$.$ The district court dismissed the case, but on appeal, the Ninth Circuit found that Valverde's claims were timely filed with the EEOC, reversing the decision and remanding the case for further proceedings. This case underscores the importance of addressing workplace harassment promptly and adhering to statutory time limits for filing discrimination lawsuit