Based on the contingency approach proposed by Christensen, Marx, and Stevenson's (2006) article, what is the degree of consensus in both "what people want" (the end) and "how to get there" (the means) among people in each of the four stories of change before the change?

Based on this analysis, which change tools would be most ideal for each of the four stories of change?

What are the intervention tools that were implemented in each of the four stories of change? In which change story did you find the largest gaps between the ideal intervention tools and the actual tools?

assignment table

HP IBM Kodak McDonald

Degree of consensus in “what they want?” 

Degree of consensus in “how to get there?” 

Ideal intervention tools for change

Actual intervention tools for change

Degree of gaps between the ideal and actual intervention tools

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Introduction Christensen Marx and Stevensons 2006 article presents the contingency approach to change emphasizing the importance of considering both w... View the full answer