Based$+$on$+$the$+$first$+$letter$+$of$+$your$+$last$+$name,$+$you've$+$been$+$assigned$+$an$+$article$+$to$+$read$+$about$+$a$+$famous$+(+$or$+$infamous,$+$depending$+$on$+$your$+$perspective$)+$case$+$of$+$whistleblowing.$+$Read$+$the$+$article$+$and$+$do$+$a$+$little$+$more$+$research$+$on$+$your$+$own,$+$then$+$create$+$a$+$post$+$in$+$which$+$you$+(1)+$recap$+$briefly$+$what$+$the$+$whistleblower$($s$)+$did$+$and$+(2)+$explain$+$whether$+$you$+$agree$+$or$+$disagree$+$with$+$the$+$decision$+$to$+$blow$+$the$+$whistle$+$and$+$why:$+(2)+$Should$+$s$/$he$+$or$+$they$+$have$+$done$+$more$+$to$+$alert$+$the$+$public$+$or$+$did$+$they$+$do$+$too$+$much?$+(2$b$)+$Was$+$the$+$whistleblowing$+$disloyal?$+(2$c$)+$What$+$ethical$+$philosophy$+$are$+$you$+$relying$+$on$+$for$+$your$+$conclusions?