Based on their different CSR ideologies, the directors will likely agree that paying the protection fee $($option a$)$ goes against corporate social responsibility. Both directors would likely see this as supporting illegal activities and potentially contributing to harm in the community. Additionally, they would likely agree that exiting the Colombian market $($option c$)$ would also align with CSR principles, as it would remove the company from a situation where they are forced to engage in unethical practices. However, they would disagree on the option of refusing to pay $($option b$).$ One director, who supports Milton Friedman's ideology, might argue that the company's primary responsibility is to maximize profits for shareholders and therefore refusing to pay would be the best option. On the other hand, the director who supports Archie Carroll's ideology might argue that refusing to pay would prioritize ethical considerations and the well$-$being of employees over profit maximization.