• Based on this suggestions for future research (see below), how you would design a study based on that recommendation from the article. What are the variables? How would you measure those variables (level of measurement - nominal, ordinal, ratio, interval)? What will be the hypothesis? Determine which statistical analysis you would propose and explain why.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine happiness and social determinants across age cohorts in Taiwan. The data were obtained from the 2011 Taiwan Social Change Survey (aged 18 +, n=2,199). The social determinants of happiness included socioeconomic status and social connection. Happiness was not different across the age groups. Receiving less family support, less formal support, more social trust and more control over life were significant for the younger group. Being married and having more social participation were significant for the middle-aged. Receiving less family support and having a higher economic status were significant for the older group.

Conclusion

Happiness was not different across different age cohort groups in Taiwanese people. However, the social factors related to happiness showed different relationships with happiness across the age groups. Socioeconomic status was more significant in determining happiness among older individuals, while a social relationship was more important for the younger and middle-aged individuals. The findings suggest that dynamic changes in social relationships in the life course may affect psychological wellbeing. These dynamic changes in social factors across the life course and their effects on happiness should be investigated in future research. It is also suggested that to maintain social support, encourage social engagement, and reduce the social disparity, it is important to have policies that aim to improve psychological wellbeing.