Bb 42398737 + learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com/5c082fb7a0cdb/42398737?X-Blackboard-S3-Bucket-learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos&X-Blackboard-Expiration=16... G Google M Inbox - rohitkumar... Q GD Sign in or Create...

Transcribed Image Text:

Bb 42398737 + learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com/5c082fb7a0cdb/42398737?X-Blackboard-S3-Bucket-learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos&X-Blackboard-Expiration=16... G Google M Inbox - rohitkumar... Q GD Sign in or Create an... Other bookmarks = 42398737 YouTube G Google Courses Bookmarks Bb Microsoft Word - P... O OPERA Cloud Front... Externships - Sene... Omegle: Talk to stra... 2 / 2 75% + | H On the occasion of Giorgio's 21st birthday, a party of 7 people went to a famous Italian Restaurant in Toronto. All the members of the group are 21 or older, with the exception of James, who is 17. The prefixed menu - which was previously agreed upon at the time of booking - included a welcome glass of champagne and 2 bottles of wine to be shared by the group. At the end of dinner, the members of the groups leave the restaurant; James, while riding his bike home, loses her balance and falls on the curbside, breaking his femur and sustaining severe injuries on his face. James was taken to the hospital where the lab analysis determined his BAC was considerably higher than the legal limit. The Court found the restaurant responsible and liable for 90% of plaintiff's damages, stating that commercial hosts have a common law obligation to protect patrons from personal injury. According to the judge, the restaurant should have taken reasonable steps to monitor the alcohol consumption at the table and, prior to sale or service, the employee in charge should have checked the patron's IDs. The Court also found a contributory negligence of 10% to be attributed to the plaintiff's behaviour, in consideration of the age and the case circumstances. 1. The facts 2. The issue(s) 3. The court's decision (Up to 5 marks) (Up to 5 marks) (1 mark) 4. Do you agree with the Court decision? Why or why not? - Justify your answer (up to 9 marks total) -7C Cloudy Q Search f > 79 ENG 16:36 IN 23-02-2023 Bb 42398737 + learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com/5c082fb7a0cdb/42398737?X-Blackboard-S3-Bucket-learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos&X-Blackboard-Expiration=16... G Google M Inbox - rohitkumar... Q GD Sign in or Create an... Other bookmarks = 42398737 YouTube G Google Courses Bookmarks Bb Microsoft Word - P... O OPERA Cloud Front... Externships - Sene... Omegle: Talk to stra... 2 / 2 75% + | H On the occasion of Giorgio's 21st birthday, a party of 7 people went to a famous Italian Restaurant in Toronto. All the members of the group are 21 or older, with the exception of James, who is 17. The prefixed menu - which was previously agreed upon at the time of booking - included a welcome glass of champagne and 2 bottles of wine to be shared by the group. At the end of dinner, the members of the groups leave the restaurant; James, while riding his bike home, loses her balance and falls on the curbside, breaking his femur and sustaining severe injuries on his face. James was taken to the hospital where the lab analysis determined his BAC was considerably higher than the legal limit. The Court found the restaurant responsible and liable for 90% of plaintiff's damages, stating that commercial hosts have a common law obligation to protect patrons from personal injury. According to the judge, the restaurant should have taken reasonable steps to monitor the alcohol consumption at the table and, prior to sale or service, the employee in charge should have checked the patron's IDs. The Court also found a contributory negligence of 10% to be attributed to the plaintiff's behaviour, in consideration of the age and the case circumstances. 1. The facts 2. The issue(s) 3. The court's decision (Up to 5 marks) (Up to 5 marks) (1 mark) 4. Do you agree with the Court decision? Why or why not? - Justify your answer (up to 9 marks total) -7C Cloudy Q Search f > 79 ENG 16:36 IN 23-02-2023

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Here is my analysis of the case 1 The facts 5 marks A group of 7 people including a 17yearold James ... View the full answer