Being terrorized by Hackers $-$ How much do you want to share or be offending online? Computer systems can be described as important, rapid, developing, and most definitely vulnerable. The nature of todays internet space is extremely cushioning and dangerous at the same time, which makes it our $($users$,$ individuals, businesses, etc.$)$ responsibility to be integral, and safe in terms of surviving life in this fragile grid. The Straters unimaginable experience as a family in Illinois suburbs is probably what could be the worst forms of cyber disturbance that can shake mental peace, and also bring us to the question of How safe are we$,$ actually? The randomness and simplicity of the victims make it all the more scary as in the words of Paul Strater, It can happen to anyone. The internet being an Open to all entity makes the potential dangers also turn into an Open to all threat. And the Straters horrifying experience is just a drop in the ocean. Cyber terrors are rampant and random, almost like a lurking presence we might never spot until attack. The ROOT of the problem, which, in the Straters case, was a chatroom conflict $($generally considered normal in workspaces$)$ involving their son that eventually, and tragically resulted in years of torment to the family. Innocent victims have no such root, and are targeted unfairly. Motives could be categorized as either internal $-$ revenge, boredom, jealousy, trying out a new persona or redirecting feelings; or external $-$ no consequences, non$-$confrontational $[1].$ And special care must be taken explicitly in order to ensure that our valuable data does not get into the wrong hands; personal data needs to be protected. The NATURE of the attacks on the couple are particularly shocking. The Bomb threats, uncalled for deliveries, the Tesla Weekend, identity theft: when someone pretending to be Paul Strater called Comcast and canceled the family's cable plan, and most importantly Swatting. Swatting attacks possibly leave the worst stains on dignity, identity, and morals, as it involves neighbors and authorities. As far as swatting is concerned, individuals do it for the bragging rights and ego, versus any monetary gain. Basically, they do it because they could $[2],$ says an Assistant Special Agent from the FBI. The rapid flushes of sudden attacks after long periods also adds to the disruption in mind and environment. While cyber crimes aim at individuals or groups, it is extremely horrifying how the Straters were for no reason publicly involved in vulgar posts, sensitive controversies, and data leaks under the spotlight of Teslas page of loads of followers which led to trauma spamming. This draws some to light some of the larger attacks like the Melissa Virus$[3]$ and the Morris Worm$[4]$ involving organizations and how the initial few cyber crimes foreshadow current threats. REPERCUSSIONS of such crimes are beyond loss; unthinkable. The harassment led to devastating social consequences for Paul and Amy Strater. This psychological impact is something that the legal gaps cannot compensate for. The victims and justice were left powerless in this case, just as in many other cyber legal cases. Practically speaking, cybersecurity provides a new access point for wealth discrimination in America, and it is a pervasive one $[5].$ As stated by the Fels Institute of Govt., UPenn, this is a matter of social injustice $[6].$ Despite the severe harassment, Kivimaki was set with minimal charges, just because of his minor status at the time. The anonymity of online threats, the power of what can go on behind a screen simply by technical knowledge, is what makes such threats leaving the criminal feeling invincible. As in the words of Kivimaki, an untouchable hacker god. AWARE and guarded is the learned way to go about this network of bots and humans, and educational videos and bait content, entertainment and threat, etc. Therefore, education about threats and protection from a young age is crucial. Studies say that the mature concept of the internet provides a platform against which older learners are able to justify why they are taught not to talk to unknown people online, to avoid clicking on potentially virus$-$laden pop$-$ups, and why they might stumble upon $($or deliberately find$)$ inappropriate content online $[7].$ Modern problems, and traditional solutions: as a student, I feel armed staying without instagram, twitter, facebook, and snapchat accounts. The thought of cyber bullying horrifies me and I also learned that no amount of precaution can fully prevent any such threats. The opinion that all of the Straters tragedy could have been avoided if not for that single argument back in the chat room, runs through my mind. Nevertheless, I feel that every viral attack makes the software run stronger the next time, and that such scenarios drive us internet users to be protected among our own data.

If $f$ is continuous and ${\displaystyle \underset{0}{\overset{6}{}}}f(x)dx=10,$ evaluat

Su