Question: Budgeting and Variance Analysis Using Only a Single Unit-Level...... Budgeting and Variance Analysis Using Only a Single Unit-Level... Budgeting and Variance Analysis Using Only a
Budgeting and Variance Analysis Using Only a Single Unit-Level......
Budgeting and Variance Analysis Using Only a Single Unit-Level...
Budgeting and Variance Analysis Using Only a Single Unit-Level Driver
Lawson Dental Products produces two different dental instruments in its St. Louis plant: crown crimping pliers and curved crown scissors. Amy Bunker, production manager, was upset with the latest performance report which indicated that she was $110,000 over the manufacturing budget. Given the efforts that she and her workers had made, she was confident that they had met or beat the budget. Not only was she upset, but she was also genuinely puzzled by the results. Of the four major manufacturing inputs in the manufacturing cost budget (direct materials, direct labor, power, and setups), only the direct materials input was not over budget. The actual costs for these four inputs follow:
| Line Item Description | Amount |
|---|---|
| Direct materials | $100,000 |
| Direct labor | 320,000 |
| Power | 135,000 |
| Setups | 140,000 |
| Total | $695,000 |
Amy knew that her operation had produced more than originally had been planned so that more power and labor had naturally been used. She also knew that the uncertainty in scheduling had led to more setups than planned. When she pointed this out to Hector Gomez, the plant controller, he assured her that the budgeted costs had been adjusted for the increase in production activity. Curious, Amy asked about the methods to make the adjustment.
Hector: If the actual level of production activity differs from the original planned level, we adjust the budget using what are called flexible budget formulasformulas that allow us to predict cost for different levels of activity.
Amy: The approach seems reasonable. However, I'm sure something is wrong here. Tell me exactly how you adjusted the costs of direct materials, direct labor, power, and setups.
Hector: First, we obtain formulas for the individual items in the budget by using the method of least squares. We assume that cost variations can be explained by variations in production activity where activity is measured by direct labor hours. Here is a list of the cost formulas (flexible budget formulas) for the four items you mentioned. The variable X is the number of direct labor hours.
Direct materials cost = $5X Direct labor cost = $15X Power cost = $5,000 + $4X Setup cost = $100,000
Second, we predict what the costs should have been for the actual level of production activity for each item by using the actual direct labor hours. In your case, the actual direct labor hours used were 20,000 direct labor hours.
Required:
1. Using the actual 20,000 direct labor hours, calculate what the costs should have been for each of the four manufacturing cost inputs.
| Line Item Description | Amount |
|---|---|
| Materials cost | $fill in the blank 1 |
| Labor cost | $fill in the blank 2 |
| Power cost | $fill in the blank 3 |
| Setup cost | $fill in the blank 4 |
What are the total after-the-fact budgeted manufacturing costs?
2. A performance report using the flexible budget outcomes in Requirement 1.
| Line Item Description | Actual | Budgeted | Variance | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Materials | $fill in the blank 6 | $fill in the blank 7 | $fill in the blank 8 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
| Direct Labor | fill in the blank 10 | fill in the blank 11 | fill in the blank 12 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
| Power | fill in the blank 14 | fill in the blank 15 | fill in the blank 16 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
| Setups | fill in the blank 18 | fill in the blank 19 | fill in the blank 20 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
| Total | $fill in the blank 22 | $fill in the blank 23 | $fill in the blank 24 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
Does the report confirm that Amy is overbudget by the amount initially claimed?
3. Suppose that Hector indicated that the standard wage rate is $15 but that because of overtime it actually averaged $16 for the period being considered. Hector also indicated that the direct labor hours allowed for the actual output were 20,500 hours.
a. Calculate the labor rate and efficiency variances.
| Line Item Description | Variance | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| LRV | $fill in the blank 28 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
| LEV | $fill in the blank 30 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
b. Explain the most likely cause(s) of these two variances.
4. Refer to Exhibit 2.2.
a. Which data analytic type or types best describe the calculation in Requirement 1?
b. Consider Requirements 3a and 3b. Which data analytic type(s) best describe these two requirements?
Budgeting, Variance Analysis, and Product Costing: Multiple Drivers Considered
After considering the explanations and analyses offered by Hector, the interaction between the two continued as follows.
Amy: I think I see the problem. Power costs don't have a lot to do with direct labor hours. They have more to do with machine hours. As production increases, machine hours increase more rapidly than direct labor hours. Also...
Hector: You know, you have a point. The coefficient of determination for power cost is only about 50%. That leaves a lot of unexplained cost variation. The coefficient for the labor and materials equations, however, is much better. It explains about 96% of the cost variation in each case. Setup costs, of course, are fixed.
Amy: Well, setup costs also have very little to do with direct labor hours. And they are certainly not fixedat least not all of them. We had to do more setups than our original plan called for because of the scheduling changes. And we must pay our people when they work extra hours. It seems like we are always paying overtime. I wonder if we simply do not have enough people for the setup activity. Also, there are supplies that are used for each setup and they are not cheap. Did you build these extra costs of increased setup activity into your budget?
Hector: No, we assume that setup costs were fixed. I see now that some of them could vary as the number of setups increases. Amy, let me see if I can develop some flexible budgeting cost formulas based on better explanatory variables. I'll get back with you in a few days.
After a few days' work, Hector developed the following flexible budget formulas, all with a coefficient of determination greater than 90%:
Direct materials cost = $5X, where X = Direct labor hours Direct labor cost = $15X, where X = Direct labor hours Power cost = $68,000 + 0.9Y, where Y = Machine hours Setup cost = $98,000 + $400Z, where Z = Number of setups
The actual measures for each of the activity drivers are as follows:
| Line Item Description | Hours |
|---|---|
| Direct labor hours | 20,000 |
| Machine hours | 90,000 |
| Number of setups | 110 |
5. Using the newly developed formulas, calculate what the costs should have been for the actual measures of activity for each of the four manufacturing activities. What are the total after-the-fact budgeted manufacturing costs?
How does this compare with the total expected costs calculated in Requirement 1?
6. A performance report using the flexible budget outcomes in Requirement 5.
| Line Item Description | Actual | Budgeted | Variance | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Materials | $fill in the blank 41 | $fill in the blank 42 | $fill in the blank 43 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
| Direct Labor | fill in the blank 45 | fill in the blank 46 | fill in the blank 47 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
| Power | fill in the blank 49 | fill in the blank 50 | fill in the blank 51 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
| Setups | fill in the blank 53 | fill in the blank 54 | fill in the blank 55 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
| Total | $fill in the blank 57 | $fill in the blank 58 | $fill in the blank 59 | FavorableUnfavorableNo variance |
Does the report validate the concerns expressed by Amy about the traditional performance report? Explain.
7. Assume that the following activity usage is provided for each of the two products:
| Product | Direct labor hours | Machine hours | Setup |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crimping pliers | 10,000 | 55,000 | 70 |
| Crown scissors | 10,000 | 35,000 | 40 |
a. Using the total budgeted costs calculated in Requirement 5, calculate a manufacturing cost rate per direct labor hour and use this rate to assign the manufacturing costs to each product line.
| Line Item Description | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cost assigned to crimping pliers | $fill in the blank 67 |
| Cost assigned to crown scissors | $fill in the blank 68 |
b. Using the budgeted costs for each activity calculated in Requirement 5, calculate an activity rate for each of the four activities and use these rates to assign manufacturing costs to each product line. Round each rate calculation to the nearest dollar except for power rate; round it to the nearest cent. Use rounded amounts in subsequent calculations.
| Line Item Description | Cost | Unit Description |
|---|---|---|
| Materials rate | $fill in the blank 69 | per DLH |
| Labor rate | $fill in the blank 70 | per DLH |
| Power rate | $fill in the blank 71 | per machine hour |
| Setup rate | $fill in the blank 72 | per setup |
| Line Item Description | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cost of crimping pliers | $fill in the blank 73 |
| Cost of crown scissors | $fill in the blank 74 |
c. Compare the product line cost assignments made in 9a and 9b. Which do you consider to be the more accurate? Explain.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
