Question: Business law S u pp o s e that the f o l l o wing seq u ence o f e v ents t

Business law

Suppose that the following sequence of events transpired in the case Byrne [B] v Tienhoven

[T](this data preempts that contained in the original case: Date of Event EventDescription

October 1 T posts offer letter in Cardiff offering to sell 1000 boxes of widgits

October 8 T posts letter of revocation

October 11 Ts Offer letter received in New York by B, who immediately telegrams acceptance

October 13 Ts Letter of Revocation received by B in New York

October 15 Acceptance letter posted by B from NewYork

October 18 T sold goods to a third party

October 20 Bs acceptance letter is received by T in Cardiff

[a] Is Postal Rule#1 to be applied in this case? How do you know?

[b] At what date, if any, has a contract formed between B & T? Why is this more complicated to determine than inthe original facts of the case? Explain?

[c] Does PR#1 trump PR#2 (or vice versa) according to the sequence of events depicted above

Business law S u pp o s e that the f o l l o wing
Suppose that the following sequence of events transpired in the case Byrne [B] v Tienheven [T])(this data preempts that contained in the original case: [a] Is Postal Rule#1 to be applied in this case? How do you know? [b] At what date, if any, has a contract formed between B \& T? Why is this more complicated to determine than in the original facts of the case? Explain? [c] Does PR#1 trump PR#2 (or vice versa) according to the sequence of events depicted above

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!