Can I please get assistance in finding different case law or statutes from Canli Canada that are similar to the tort claims that arise below. It will be helpful to get case law for each tort claim similar to the issue listed as well.

1. Negligence by Speedicab Ltd.: Speedicab Ltd. could be held liable for negligence in the hiring and supervision of Gabriel, their employee. Gabriel's erratic driving and bizarre behavior indicate a failure on the part of Speedicab to ensure the competency and mental stability of their drivers.
2. Negligent Entrustment: Floria could argue that Speedicab Ltd. negligently entrusted their taxi to Gabriel, knowing or should have known that he posed a risk to passengers and others on the road due to his erratic behavior.
3. Negligence by Gabriel: Gabriel's actions in accelerating towards the bus and endangering the lives of his passengers and others on the road constitute negligence.
4. Negligence by Floria: Floria's decision to jump out of the taxi without warning or regard for the safety of herself or others could be considered negligent, especially considering that she injured Nestor in the process.
5. Negligence by Nestor: Nestor might be accused of contributory negligence if it can be shown that he failed to exercise reasonable care for his own safety, such as not paying attention to his surroundings or failing to move out of the way when Floria leaped from the taxi.
6. Conversion: Floria could also claim conversion against Speedicab Ltd. for the loss of her briefcase containing $10,000 in cash, alleging that the company deprived her of her property by failing to secure it properly in the taxi.