can you create a correlation model from which to derive the score? Assessment tool system development

Method:

Definition of ethical issues:

Identify the ethical issues that the Assessment Tool will cover.

Identify the ethical issues to be addressed. Use a variety of sources, such as ethical theories, codes of conduct and current events.

Create questions:

Create questions that assess the user's understanding of ethical issues.

Use a variety of question formats, such as multiple choice, true$/$false$,$ and short answer.

Evaluate answers:

Develop a system for evaluating the user's responses.

Take into account various factors such as accuracy, consistency and justification.

Provide advice:

Create personalized advice for the user based on their responses.

The advice should be based on ethical principles and take into account the user's beliefs and values.

Method representation schema

Start

$|$

V

Identification of Ethical Issues

$|$

V

question design

$|$

V

response analysis

$|$

V

Providing feedback

$|$

V

End

Tools and resources:

Research on ethical issues

Resources: research on ethical issues.

Ethical theories

Tools for generating research

Evaluation systems

Consulting platforms

Challenges:

Identifying appropriate ethical issues

Establish objective and unbiased questions

Develop a reliable evaluation system

Create personalised and useful advice

Applications:

Education

Business

Non$-$profit organizations

Government

Assessment of Descriptive Questions $-$ Reflection Points $($worst$,$ best cases$)$

Assessment of user responses to LLM Assessment Tool on ethics issues:

Measurement Generation $(7$ HLEG Requirements$)$:

Accuracy: comparison of response to ethical principles$/$laws$/$rules$.$

Coherence: internal consistency & logic in response.

Completeness: Coverage of all relevant ethical aspects.

Transparency: Clear & understandable justification.

Impartiality: Absence of bias & stereotyping.

Sensitivity: Recognition & respect for different perspectives.

Originality: Creative & non$-$standard thinking.

Evaluation suggestions

Proposal

Correlation with measurement

Ontology

Create Tagging System:

Tagging system for the assessment

Tagging system for the learning path

Filtering system:

filtering system for the assessment

filtering system for the learning path

Easier assessment, possible differentiation of score extraction, Accuracy

Create integrated score, Score card

Coherence

Learning path design $($from general to specific, personalised$).$ Learning to be carried out in a way that the interface remains user friendly $,$ information simple and understandable so as not to be tedious and easy to identify, keywords explanatory on the important questions.

Coherence, originality.

creation of validation questions

Design of the way in which the analysis of the users' answers is carried out

Transparency, coherence

Identification of ethical issues that may arise from the action or decision under consideration through key$-$ words.

Completeness, Transparency, Impartiality, Sensitivity

Reviewer can create different tags for users will be able to essentially filter by user's answers for a group of questions $,$ so depending on the answers it gives the tag

Provide Feedback:

Summary Review: Individual rating for each metric.

Informative comments: Explanations of strengths & weaknesses.

Suggested improvements: Guidance for more ethical responses.

Examples: Comparison with apt & imperfect answers.$($Create model apt auxiliary answers that have been proven to improve businesses and in the long run led to the adoption of ethically tested solutions$)$ Creating imperfect answers where the ethical gap is deliberately shown for didactic purposes$)$

Sources: References to relevant ethical theories & codes. $($knowledge base$)$

Additional possibilities:

Interactive visualization: Display of measurements in graphs & charts. $($ creation of an animated guideline graph based on correlations$)$

Graphical visualization of graphical graphs, graphical representation of graphs, graphical representation of graphs, graphical graphs, graphical display of graphs, graphical representation of graphs: Personalization of metrics & feedback based on LLM & audience.

Educational content: Provide learning resources for ethics.

Community: Creating a space for discussion & exchange of views. Provide a forum for discussion and sharing of knowledge and debate $($ open forum with faqs$).$

Good practices:

Use clear & understandable vocabulary.

Focus on reinforcing ethical thinking.

Promote critical thinking & self$-$reflection.

Create a learning & growth environment. Evaluation of user responses to LLM Assessment Tool on ethics issues:

Measurement Generation $(7$ HLEG Requirements$)$:

Accuracy: comparison of response to ethical principles$/$laws$/$rules$.$

Coherence: internal consistency & logic in response.

Completeness: Coverage of all relevant ethic