Can you expand these data collection instruments The development and selection of data collection instruments that will capture the

quantitative and qualitative data required for this research. The study has several particulars

that suggest multiple modes of data that will be gathered from a variety of sources making the

need to formulate an approach that appropriate between detail and feasibility. The main data

collection tools comprise of the following:

$$ Structured Surveys and Questionnaires: To gather quantitative data on the

effectiveness of corruption prevention strategies, structured surveys and

questionnaires will be employed. This is beneficial because it provides uniform

evaluations of attitudes, perceptions, and self$-$reported behaviors among both JCA and

$6$

CBP personnel. Surveys will comprise of yes$/$no questions and multiple$-$choice

options on various elements of anti$-$corruption measurement including compliance

mechanisms, reporting systems and perceptions around training efficacy.

$$ This will be complemented by semi$-$structured interviews with customs officials,

policy advisors and anti$-$corruption officers to provide rich qualitative data. It

provides the opportunity to probe issues raised by participants, while still maintaining

an overall structure. Interview questions will touch upon individual experiences,

perceived impediments and suggestions about those practices towards anti$-$

corruptions.

$$ Observation checklists: While direct observation will only be a component of the

assessment $($the practical manifestation of corruption prevention measures$),$

researchers will use observational checklists to record specific actions, behaviours,

and practices. It allows for in$-$the$-$moment observations of how anti$-$corruption

processes are being implemented within customs environments.

$$ Documents: The study will involve an in$-$depth review of relevant documents, such as

policy manuals, training materials, compliance reports, and JCA and CBP audit

records. We can verify self$-$reported data via document analysis, and in doing so$,$ help

pinpoint gaps between policy and practice.

Data collection tools, materials and equipment

$$ Digital Survey Platforms: Using survey platforms such as SurveyMonkey or Qualtrics.

They provide not only data safety, anonymity and statistics tools which are required to

process corruption$-$related sensitive information.

$$ Audio recorders: High quality audio recorders are required in semi$-$structured

interviews because the responses of the interviewees need to be recorded accurately.

$7$

Such detailed responses can be secured with the help of audio recordings, and

researchers have the opportunity to repeat interviews later for a complete transcription.

$$ Sensitive materials from interviews, surveys and document analysis individually

isolated for that same participant will be stored securely in encrypted client$-$based cloud

storage solutions $($for example Photoshop information as Google Drive or Dropbox

Business$)$ Cloud storage enables researchers to access and collaborate easily, while

keeping their work confidential.

$$ Observational Checklists and Field Notebooks: For the observation component of the

study, researchers will employ observational checklists and field notebooks to document

observations in a systematic manner. It is complemented by mobile applications, such

as Evernote for storing and tagging observations for easy retrieval and analysis.

$$ Policy and Document Analysis Software: NVivo$/$ATLAS$.$ Ti will assist in document

analysis$($i$.$e$.$ categorizing, coding and analyzing policy documents$/$records$).$ These

software systems offer more sophisticated text search and pattern recognition abilities,

which help to detect overlapping themes and contradictions.