can you help me respond to this post with the questions below maximum 2 paragraphs

Misconduct in the legal profession is a serious issue that undermines both public trust and the integrity of the justice system. Common forms of misconduct include prosecutorial misconduct, such as withholding exculpatory evidence or making improper statements during trial; judicial misconduct, which may involve bias, conflicts of interest, or abuse of discretion; and attorney misconduct, such as neglecting client interests, breaching confidentiality, or engaging in fraud. These behaviors compromise fairness in legal proceedings and can lead to wrongful convictions or miscarriages of justice (Gershman, 2016).

Several reasons have been offered for why misconduct occurs. Systemic pressuresincluding heavy caseloads, political influence, and the adversarial nature of the legal systemoften push professionals toward unethical shortcuts. Cultural norms, such as loyalty to colleagues and the "code of silence," discourage reporting misconduct. Personal factors, including ambition, greed, or cynicism about justice, also play a role. Finally, structural issues like prosecutorial immunity and weak oversight mechanisms enable misconduct by limiting accountability (Green, 2013). Together, these factors create an environment where misconduct can persist unchecked.

Solutions to address misconduct include disciplinary boards, judicial review, ethics committees, and mandatory continuing education. These measures aim to hold professionals accountable and reinforce ethical standards. However, their sufficiency is debatable. For example, prosecutorial immunity often shields misconduct from consequences, undermining accountability (Berger v. United States, 1935). Ethics training helps raise awareness but cannot fully prevent misconduct without cultural change within the profession. Transparency initiatives, such as public reporting and independent oversight commissions, are promising but require consistent enforcement to be effective. Therefore, while current solutions are valuable, they are not sufficient on their own. Stronger accountability mechanisms, cultural reforms, and limits on immunity are necessary to restore confidence in the legal system.

• Prosecutors are immune from Section 1983 liability for their decision to prosecute or actions taken in preparation for or during trial. Additionally, Prosecutors have limited immunity for actions taken during the investigative phase of a case.
• Do you think that this is appropriate? State the reasons for your stance.