Can you summarize the below for me in paragraph format?

In Arizona, a party can request a new judge under Rule 10 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, Rule 10.2 allows for such a change without the necessity of providing a reason, as long as the request is made within a certain timeframe and for valid reasons. However, there are unacceptable reasons for seeking a new judge, including attempts to delay the case, selecting a judge based on favoritism, or avoiding a judge already assigned to the case. Acceptable reasons for requesting a new judge encompass several factors: bias or prejudice, where the judge may be perceived as unfairly biased against a party; prior involvement, which occurs if the judge has previously been associated with the case in a manner that could affect their impartiality, such as representing one of the parties; and incompatibility, where the judge's management style in the courtroom conflicts with the interests of a party, even if there is no direct bias involved. Additionally, public perception can be a valid reason if the judge's past rulings or statements could potentially undermine public trust in the court. Constitutional grounds also provide justification for a change of judge, particularly in cases where there might be violations of a party's constitutional rights, such as issues concerning due process. It is important for a party to file the motion for a change of judge before any significant decisions are made by the judge. The request must be genuine and based on credible concerns to be considered valid. An understanding of these acceptable reasons is essential for maintaining a fair judicial process and safeguarding the rights of all parties involved.