Case 1.

Chris smiled as he received the analysis packet from his supervisor. He worked from home 3 days a week, and when he received an assignment he did not know how to analyze, he would call one of his buddies who easily accomplished such tasks. He compensated him, usually with a case of beer, when they got together on the weekends. They had been friends for a long time, and Chris knew he could trust him to do a good job on the tasks. Chris would then tailor the analysis according to the way the firm expected reports to be submitted.

Chris was perceived as one of the most dependable analysts in the division because of his past work, much of which had been farmed out to his buddy. He had received accolades and raises as a result and was enjoying his successful career with the firm.

Questions:

1. The method used by Chris is obviously successful, and the company is satisfied with the results. Is it just good business, or is there an ethical dilemma present?
2. Should Chris confess to his supervisor or just continue the successful deception?
3. Would your responses change if the information used in the analyses is proprietary and sensitive?
4. Does this activity fit the notion of plagiarism?
5. Does online communication make Chris actions more likely?