Question: Case 8: Preston v. Ferrer, 552 U.S. 346 (U.S. Sup. Ct. 2008). (Mallor 16th Ed., p 55, No. 2). Alex Ferrer, a former judge who
Case 8: Preston v. Ferrer, 552 U.S. 346 (U.S. Sup. Ct. 2008). (Mallor 16th Ed., p 55, No. 2).
Alex Ferrer, a former judge who appeared as Judge Alex on a television program, entered into a contract with Arnold Preston, a California attorney who rendered services to persons in the entertainment industry. Seeking fees allegedly due under the contract, Preston invoked the clause setting forth the parties' agreement to arbitrate any dispute relating to the terms of [the contract] or the breach, validity, or legality thereof in accordance with the rules [of the American Arbitration Association]. Ferrer countered Preston's demand for arbitration by filing, with the California Labor Commissioner, a petition in which he contended that the contract was unenforceable under the California Talent Agencies Act (CTAA) because Preston supposedly acted as a talent agent without the license required by the CTAA. In addition, Ferrer sued Preston in a California court, seeking a declaration that the dispute between the parties regarding the contract and its validity was not subject to arbitration. Ferrer also sought an injunction restraining Preston from proceeding before the arbitrator unless and until the Labor Commissioner concluded that she did not have authority to rule on the parties' dispute. Preston responded by moving to compel arbitration, in reliance on the Federal Arbitration Act. The California court denied Preston's motion to compel arbitration and issued the injunction sought by Ferrer.
| 1. The Federal Arbitration Act preempts both the petition Ferrer filed with the California Labor Commissioner under the California Talent Agencies Act and the request for injunctive relief Ferrer filed with a California court. | |
| 2. Neither Preston nor Ferrer are entitled to discovery in their AAA arbitration proceeding. | |
| 3. If the cost of proceeding with the arbitration and employing expert witnesses to prove Prestons claim for fees due under his agreement with Ferrer was prohibitive and exceeded the maximum recovery available to Preston, the federal district court can determine that the arbitration agreement is unenforceable. | |
| 4. Neither Preston nor Ferrer can pursue a class action arbitration under the terms of their arbitration agreement. | |
| 5. If Preston is not satisfied with the amount of the award of the arbitrator in his claim against Ferrer, he can seek to vacate that award in the federal district court in California under the Federal Arbitration Act. |
Questions are True and False with an explanation to support your answer.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
