$*$Case A$*$: $**$Deceptive Sales at World Cameras$**$

$-$ Saler at World Camera receives a $20\%$ commission instead of $10\%$ as usual to sell overstocked cameras.

$-$ Rebecca $-$ a uni student wishes to purchase a cam for being a novice but learning photographers, and research carefully.

$-$ Saler shows her another camera, far more expensive and less practical for her needs.

$*$Question:$*$

$1.$ To what extent is this a case of deceptive sales? Does the fact that Audrey sold Rebecca a $$better$$ camera with more sophisticated features justify the sale?

$2.$ Is the fact that Audrey will receive a higher financial bonus relevant to a moral assessment of her actions?

$3.$ Does the salesperson$$s $$taking$$ or steering Rebecca towards a particular product, in this case, a more expensive camera, represent significant harm to the customer? Should customers expect salespeople be objective, with the customer$$s best interest in mind?