Case Assignment 1- Chapter 6 Case 4 Community Sportsplex Ltd. purchased a block of land from a small municipality for the development of a sports facility consisting of an outdoor sports field, and an indoor arena with a standard ice surface with a seating capacity for 3,000 spectators. The municipality had zoned the area for 'recreational use and prohibited the construction of residential housing on the land. This was so because a part of the land had been a former landfill site, and the surface soil subject to some settling as the garbage buried below gradually decomposed. Community Sportsplex Ltd. was unaware of the former use, but nevertheless, engaged the services of Geo Engineering Corporation Ltd., a soil testing business, to determine the suitability of the surface and subsurface to support the proposed arena building. The proposed location of the building was at the edge of the landfill area, and soil testing indicated that the land was suitable for the construction of the building. Shortly after the soil had been tested, the architect that designed the arena building in consultation with Community Sportsplex Ltd. decided to move the location of the proposed building some 10 meters closer to the playing field. As a result, the new location placed one wall of the proposed building on the landfill area. A contract for construction of the building was given to a contractor who proceeded to excavate for the footings of the building. In the area over the former landfill the contractor discovered the poor soil conditions, and extensive work was required to stabilize the ground for the building footings. The contractor determined that this added cost was approximately $50,000. Community Sportsplex Ltd. refused to pay the additional cost. Discuss the rights of the parties and the possible outcome if the dispute should be taken to court for a decision