Case: Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, 554 U.S. 84 (2008)

Parties:

• Facts:
• Issue:
• Applicable Law(s):
• Holding:
• Reasoning:
• Case Questions:
• How might you have directed Knolls to have modified its evaluation structure to have avoided this claim in the first place?
• What is the difference between the burden of production and the burden of persuasion?
• Justice Souter writes that employers might alter their business practices in order to avoid being sued and that "this will sometimes affect the way employers do business with their employees." What do you think he meant by these statements, and if you were an employer, what changes might you now implement as a result of this ruling?
• Conclusion:
• 
  
• Reference

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 Meacham v Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory 554 US 84 2008 Parties Plaintiffs A group of older employees laid off by Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory KAP... View the full answer