Question: Case Problem Analysis: Wrongful Interference technology company, as a sales manager. His contract with MedTron had a non - compete clause that prohibited him from
Case Problem Analysis: Wrongful Interference
technology company, as a sales manager. His contract with MedTron had a noncompete clause that prohibited him from working for acompetitor for one year after leaving MedTron. St Francis Medical, SC Inc., was a competitor of MedTron. In an effort to expand their business, St Francis contacted Hubert about joining them. Hubbert felt dissatisfied with conditions at MedTron, and so began negotiations with St Francis. Hubert shared his current contract with St Francis's executives, who told him that his contract with MedTron was unenforceable and offered him a job as a sales director at a significant higher salary. In fact, the contract was enforceable under state law. Hubert accepted the job offer from St Francis. MedTron filed a suit against St Francis, alleging wrongful interference. Did wrongful interference occur and if so which type of wrongful interference occurred?
Apply It: Wrongful Interference
Total points:
Attempts left:
St Francis told Hubert that the contract
St Francis
select answer to Hubert at a
select answer salary. Based on these
facts, it select answer that St Francis intentionally induced Hubert to break his contract with MedTron.
Hubert select answer liable for intentional interference with a contract because select answer
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
