Case Study 2 Hide Assignment Information Instructions Question #1: Evaluate the events and facts in the case study relative to the 20 Axioms. In each case, state the axiom, the violation, and the resulting damage. Additionally, identify what could have been done to prevent this violation? Question #2: Estimate the "shared-fault" split between client and consultant in this case study. Based on the estimate, prepare a "finding" as if you were chairperson of the jury hearing this suit, and what your findings would be and why? Please cite specific examples in the case study to support your thoughts and opinions. Attachments Case Study Number 2.doc (45 KB) tly itor 8. Assignment Question #1: Evaluate the events and facts in the case study relative to the 20 Axioms. In each case, state the axiom, the violation, and the resulting damage. Additionally, identify what could have been done to prevent this violation? Question #2: Estimate the "shared-fault" split between client and consultant in this case study. Based on the estimate, prepare a "finding" as if you were chairperson of the jury hearing this suit, and what your findings would be and why? Please cite specific examples in the case study to support your thoughts and opinions. Case Study 2 Hide Assignment Information Instructions Question #1: Evaluate the events and facts in the case study relative to the 20 Axioms. In each case, state the axiom, the violation, and the resulting damage. Additionally, identify what could have been done to prevent this violation? Question #2: Estimate the "shared-fault" split between client and consultant in this case study. Based on the estimate, prepare a "finding" as if you were chairperson of the jury hearing this suit, and what your findings would be and why? Please cite specific examples in the case study to support your thoughts and opinions. Attachments Case Study Number 2.doc (45 KB) tly itor 8. Assignment Question #1: Evaluate the events and facts in the case study relative to the 20 Axioms. In each case, state the axiom, the violation, and the resulting damage. Additionally, identify what could have been done to prevent this violation? Question #2: Estimate the "shared-fault" split between client and consultant in this case study. Based on the estimate, prepare a "finding" as if you were chairperson of the jury hearing this suit, and what your findings would be and why? Please cite specific examples in the case study to support your thoughts and opinions