Case Study Instructions Overview: In this lesson, you will analyze a CASE STUDY involving two youths who committed a serious crime. The case, which took place in Langford, British Columbia, involves the murder of a young girl named Kimberley Proctor. Your task is to examine the circumstances of this case and apply the theoretical knowledge you've acquired in previous lessons to address the problems presented. The objective of this assignment is to demonstrate your ability to apply legal concepts to real-world scenarios. Assignment Details: Video Analysis: You will watch a video detailing the case of Kimberley Proctor. Weight: This assignment is worth 20% of your overall grade. Points: The assignment is out of 20 points. Evaluation Criteria: Your work will be assessed based on content, spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, and formatting. Ensure you proofread your work thoroughly. It should have a cover page and be in APA format. Remember any AI presentation will result in a zero mark.

Critical Thinking Questions: Rehabilitation vs. Weak Law: In 2010, the two youths in this case received adult sentences with the possibility of parole after 10 years. Adults sentenced to life imprisonment are eligible for parole after 25 years. Do you agree with the eligibility for parole after 10 years for youths sentenced as adults? Why or why not? Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) and Adult Sentencing: At the time of the crime, the accused were 16 and 17 years old. The YCJA generally does not allow youths to be tried as adults, but they can receive an adult sentence if they commit a presumptive offense. Did the two youths in this case meet the criteria for an adult sentence? Did they both receive adult sentences or youth sentences? Explain. The youths in this case are eligible for parole after serving 10 years. Do you believe this reflects successful rehabilitation or weak Canadian law? Justify your answer. Appropriateness of the Punishment: As of August 2022, one of the accused, Kruse Wellwood, applied for parole and day passes but was denied and remains in prison. Do you agree with the parole board's decision to deny his request, or do you believe he should be released on parole? Provide your reasoning. Additionally, do you believe this decision reflects successful rehabilitation or weak Canadian law? Justify your answer.

Report Requirements In your report, provide a detailed synopsis of the case, including the following: Facts in Issue: Who was involved, what happened, where, when, how, and why. Police Challenges: Discuss any difficulties the police faced in investigating this case and in adhering to the Youth Criminal Justice Act provisions. Adherence to Rights: Examine whether the rights of the two accused were respected by the police and if the statements taken were done properly according to the YCJA. YCJA Provisions: Analyze what the YCJA allowed in terms of sentencing and suppression of the accused's identities. Legal System Response: Assess how the legal system handled the case overall.

Remember, the depth of your analysis and the clarity of your writing will be key factors in your success on this assignment. Good luck!